IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
TOPIC: "Nick"
|
|
Re:"Nick" 5 Years, 2 Months ago
|
|
Thank you everyone, music to my delicate porcelain ears!
I have my own one man band working night and day convincing people to just "think" and analyse the non evidence. They always come back and want to know more. One thing I have noticed is that folk think they are "expected" to say "dirty filthy so and so" which I have to sit and take, but I understand they say this to protect themselves. When they know who I am they are fascinated and "admit" I always thought there was more to this. At this point you can't shut me up..... The diaries, the fake daughter, the Lawyers, our Spindler meeting and his apologies, the DNA, his grave etc etc....... I can really bang on given the opportunity (just like now)
One thing is for sure, I've had a 100% success rate and its easy, when folk know they are in safe Savile company they speak honestly and openly. That speaks volumes doesn't it? My delicate ears and soul need to wade through the hate first but it's worth it. Onwards!!!!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re: "Nick" 5 Years, 2 Months ago
|
|
tdf wrote:
I am not going to lie, I was a believer in the allegations initially
Am ashamed to say I was too. Just assumed that a TV documentary must be reliable (though I do remember wondering where MWT had come from as I hadn't seen him before). How silly and naive! It wasn't until I came across Anna Raccoon's blog, then Moor Larkin's and Rabbitaway's, that I started questioning things. I also remember bursting out laughing at the report of Jimmy Savile wearing a ring made from "a dead man's eye". It's just the kind of joke my grandfather would have made if he'd worn a ring of that kind.
Amanda wrote:
One thing is for sure, I've had a 100% success rate and its easy, when folk know they are in safe Savile company they speak honestly and openly. That speaks volumes doesn't it? My delicate ears and soul need to wade through the hate first but it's worth it. Onwards!!!!!
That's great to hear! It seems a good reason to hope that slowly but surely most people will come to realise how duped they were.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
Last Edit: 2019/01/26 15:50 By JK2006.
|
|
|
|
Re:"Nick" 5 Years, 2 Months ago
|
|
I hope I'm not speaking out of turn here but one of the weird things about the Savile case was the allegation by one of his great-nieces that she was abused by him - a claim that was investigated by police for reasons other than the obvious one.
www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/405...n-compensation-claim
The outcome of the police investigation was never made public, to my knowledge. Why not? Either he had been abusing her or he hadn't. And if the result of the investigation was that he hadn't, was it somehow convenient that the public were not allowed to know?
Super injunction to protect the (in)credibility of Yewtree, maybe? Or to keep the 'Savile is a paedo' gravy train chugging along nicely?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|