Notice the Compensation of £22,000. After my second trial the False Accuser about whose claims I was acquitted got £17,000 as he boasted to the Mirror, bravely waiving his anonymity in return for another large cheque. In 2018 I was again found Not Guilty of any crimes against him. What a strange society we live in.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7132263...s-evidence-time.html

£22,000 is the amount the Rolf Harris accuser in relation to whose allegations his conviction was overturned on appeal reportedly received and the amount this Savile accuser received (Jimmy Savile victim says compensation is a ‘joke’ after years of abuse, Moor Larkin: The 35th Man). Perhaps it's some kind of standard amount.

He denies 12 charges of perverting justice and one of fraud by falsely claiming £22,000 criminal injuries compensation.

As it was proven that Rolf Harris was never at the community centre (and therefore could not have attacked the woman), why wasn't she charged with fraud when the conviction was overturned?

And presumably it was just a minor inconvenience that Rolf Harris got nine months' jail on her account.

"Leisha said she was abused by up to 30 men at the BBC Television Centre when she was aged between eight and 11."

To my way of thinking that's an awful lot of perverted men prowling around the BBC.

There's a thought-provoking contribution in the comments section:

She can't stand next to men and has to put the phone down... yet she's had 5 children. I assume to men?

There's also this:

www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jimmy-savi...ctim-abused-12672832


One her first day wide-eyed Leisha ­wandered around the TV centre clutching her autograph book in the hope of seeing her favourite celebrities. Instead she was ­introduced to a ­paedophile ring.

Surely I'm not the only one seeing a pattern here?

Sheba Bear wrote:
"Leisha said she was abused by up to 30 men at the BBC Television Centre when she was aged between eight and 11."

To my way of thinking that's an awful lot of perverted men prowling around the BBC.

There's a thought-provoking contribution in the comments section:

She can't stand next to men and has to put the phone down... yet she's had 5 children. I assume to men?

There's also this:

www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jimmy-savi...ctim-abused-12672832


One her first day wide-eyed Leisha ­wandered around the TV centre clutching her autograph book in the hope of seeing her favourite celebrities. Instead she was ­introduced to a ­paedophile ring.

Surely I'm not the only one seeing a pattern here?

You couldn't "wander around the television centre" hoping for autographs or anything else.
It was hard enough to get in even when they were expecting you.

Sheba Bear wrote:
As it was proven that Rolf Harris was never at the community centre (and therefore could not have attacked the woman), why wasn't she charged with fraud when the conviction was overturned?
I'd like to know that too.

That's an interesting comment about the Savile accuser. Just incredible that she could have been taken seriously. She does seem rather similar to the Harris accuser, e.g. both supposedly autograph hunters and both complained the compo wasn't enough.

"Her five children were taken away from her and she was so volatile and vulnerable she was unable to hold down a job.

Leisha even spent time in prison in the mid 1990s after attacking the home of someone she became convinced had abused one of her own children."

Wonder what the real story is.

The Savile accuser appeared in court for not having a TV licence because she refused to pay money to the BBC. In this article the number of men who allegedly abused her has shot up to 35 and the time period has been reduced to two years. She doesn't state though whether she watches BBC programmes. My guess is that she does.

express.co.uk/news/uk/383143/Revenge-of-Jimmy-Savile-victim

There was a network of paedophiles at the BBC who abused me. I just can’t understand how so many of them could have been working under one roof.


Nor can I.

Isn't this the same Leisha Brookes who was one of the leading knuckle draggers in the English Defence League? It's amazing how she's unable to pick up the phone or open the curtains, yet can confidently stride out on extreme right wing marches.

jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.com/2016/05/the-35th-man.html

Sheba Bear wrote:
He denies 12 charges of perverting justice and one of fraud by falsely claiming £22,000 criminal injuries compensation.

As it was proven that Rolf Harris was never at the community centre (and therefore could not have attacked the woman), why wasn't she charged with fraud when the conviction was overturned?



I believe criminal injuries compensation is awarded based on the balance of probabilities, rather than beyond reasonable doubt. This would account for some payouts to complainants where there was no conviction.


However in the case of Rolf Harris never being at the community centre, it now seems pretty well established - on the balance of probabilities - that he was never there and the incident didn't happen. Relentless feminist propaganda (unsupported by behavioural science literature) attempts to make us believe that failing to remember major details, getting others provably wrong and changing yet other details significantly is completely typical of victims of abuse. So that prooooooves they're telling the truth. It's a complete inversion, on ideological grounds, of the credibility of these witnesses.


If this lying witness were indeed to be prosecuted for fraudulently claiming compensation, I don't think claims of trauma interfering with memory would be enough to account for the incident apparently being completely fabricated.

I can see how in a "grooming" situation the aggressor would choose someone who is vulnerable, perhaps from a troubled background or involved with crime, and it is important that these people have the same right to justice as anyone else.


But how come when it is a celebrity groping people all over the place in public do they STILL appear to choose the vulnerable ones, when they couldn't possibly tell them from the rest of the crowd?