As we suspected, for one man at least, it was all a front.

www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/paedophile...child-abuse-16515896

… and quite possibly also for people working as "official" vigilantes. Police employees, or former employees, people involved in so-called treatment for so-called sex criminals, various charity activists etc etc

I have said this many times that the ones who shout the loudest.
The sea went out but now it's coming back in bringing the crap with it.
Stinson Hunter is another and yes plenty of police officers are nasty gets ex cops also having things to hide.

Yes, you do have to wonder about people who choose to focus on that subject, rather than being required to as part of their job. It looks as if even some people who do so because they're claiming to have been abused may fall into the suspect category.

Moor Larkin puts it very well (in a comment under the article):

"It's fairly clear that the "Activists" are mostly petty criminals and ex-alcoholics or hop-heads. The head honchoes that are visible all have well-dodgy CV's and appear to vary their stories as they go along. They also never have real contemporaries to add balance or credence to their versions of events. You have to believe them - end of discussion. If you don't they fly into wild temper tantrums.

They flew into a rage when David Rose got the Mail to re-expose Steven Messham, although why Messham needed to be exposed yet again is baffling. Rose referred to it as Institutional Amnesia I think. I would see it more as conniving sensationalist journalism, political agendas and pure commercial greed by a pack of lying liars and sex fantasists. I'm sure a lot of them get their jollies describing all this sex stuff."
jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.com/2015/01/wh...e.html?view=flipcard

Yes Jo, Moor Larkin is so spot on with his investigations and writings.

Am I alone in feeling a tad sorry for this bloke as he does seem to have mental problems and exhibits natural human failings albeit in a very controversial manner.

But it does highlight the folly of encouraging vigilantism as the Vigilantes are not held to the same standards as the police and especially this exposes a former PC who seems to have falsified his credentials and experience and gone on IV basically encouraging these creepy people by stating he "understands" them.
# I won't say his name although the initials M, W and T come to mind.

Well I don't understand them and believe they are all highly suspect and it should be noted: police who work in these fields are eventually re-assigned to units totally unconnected so they don't become obsessive.

## while police have the power to pose as 14 year old girls and create a crime they may not have existed I cannot understand how the courts allow the public to do likewise??