cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
False Accusers, Enablers and Greed.
Go to bottomPost New TopicPost Reply
TOPIC: False Accusers, Enablers and Greed.
#194054
False Accusers, Enablers and Greed. 4 Years, 4 Months ago  
Watching Vile Virginia and her false allegations against Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein and the other ghastly Panorama woman with her fake lips and teeth, I spotted so many recognisable traits, ranging from Epstein’s “egg shaped penis” to the “raped at seven” backstory. These media provoked details crop up in all false allegations, usually prompted by helpful police or lawyers, sometimes by the media itself, who knows how to polish a turd into a great story.

Tears help. And media adores converting innocent questions on E-Mail like “I need to know more about this false accuser” into proof of guilt. Better story.

But punters have latched on too; Cliff Richard had his very public lifestyle - being a Christian, adapted into a “plausible” tale. Notice that is the most complimentary viewers and critics can be about Vile Virginia - “plausible”.

Likewise Paul Gambaccini - a BBC DJ. Openly gay. Easy to work on that, liars.

Best, of course, if the victims are dead. The changes in the Leaving Neverland stories echoed the latest Jeffrey Epstein claims. I recognised constant repetition in the lies against me. A Rolls Royce is always mentioned (even before I first bought one). Five pound notes (50 years ago) turned into £20 notes by the 80s. I was astonished that “breath smelled of cigars” didn’t come up; it certainly featured in all the Savile lies. Giving promotion records to assist a campaign became bribes.

Lawyers working for me recently were astonished when Learned QC’s and counsels confirmed details that my own lawyers had assumed were JK exaggerations. False accusers colluding to push down dates don’t realise proof of their deliberate efforts can be unearthed. Carl Beech got 18 years for attempting to pervert the course of justice and his victims were mostly dead. Observers are amazed that Harvey Proctor has settled for around a million pounds. They ain’t seen nothing yet.

Many of us are shocked that there aren’t more prosecutions of liars. Danny Day should be serving a long jail sentence for what he did to David Bryant. Why not? Because officers were enablers and police protect their own. Not a single bent cop in the Carl Beech case has ended up in jail. They are happy to fire fellow cops who squeezed a female cops tits or commented on a passing backside but they keep their prosecutions to politically correct crimes, often using such absurd things as receiving porn (and not opening or watching it) as excuses for disciplining black officers. Generally, top cops hate gays or the wrong skin colour.

A dodgy woman in my recent case has been described as “an extremely capable and dedicated officer”. Little do they know the wealth of evidence proving her to be incompetent at best (they admit that) but corrupt at worst (they have not yet examined those complaints).

The system is broken, shattered, in pieces. One of the reasons I was amazed that I escaped unscathed in 2018 was that I didn’t believe there was such a thing as a decent, honest judge. Hopefully there will be more emerging over future months.

And just a few decent, honest hacks. Is anyone checking up on Vile Virgina’s history, I wonder? How she met her husband (was he a former client? was he introduced to her by anyone?). She and the woman with the lips and teeth told so many porkies (described by police and media as “inconsistencies” like “plausible” or “credible and true”) that even Panorama had to admit some.
They glossed over the money she’s made (£160,000 from a British tabloid at the start; no wonder she loves this country and our Royal family). Some people will do or say anything for cash. In my day we used to call them prostitutes.

The Internet has assisted this wave of crime, of course. Libel is difficult now, with global laws being different to local ones. You can get away with murder. But Vile Virgina and Loopy Lips may yet find that there’s another side to false allegations. As Carl Beech discovered.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#194057
hedda

Re:False Accusers, Enablers and Greed. 4 Years, 4 Months ago  
terrific post.

# I really feel sorry for that black officer and her relatives over the porn bust. What a really terrible situation she found herself over a matter that rational, sane intelligent people should have been able to sort out without destroying a career.

## I do have a feeling that Virginia's story will fall over at some stage and as I (obviously ) predicted..Andrew is Royal not just a Prince.
He has 2 royal detectives with him at all times whether he likes it or not. He cannot escape them. If he visited the Maxwell lady in her small mews house (Gawd I miss mine..20 years off Portobello Rd ) they would sit outside in a car.

And they keep strict records and diaries for legal reasons. Imagine if someone takes a pot shot at Andrew (someone did in Australia..jumped on a stage and fired a starting pistol at Charles..he's now a respected Barrister )..these detectives have to keep meticulous records as evidence.

Now we hear that in the USA he also had two US diplomatic bodyguards at all times..of course the US doesn't want a Royal harmed on their soil.

All of this would be knowledge to The Met & the FBI and I guarantee after looking at records it's why they aren't interested.

But the Royals keep their powder dry as this tale will fall over eventually and fizzle out and the Ghastly media know that Royals don't sue for libel. ( awaiting to see how they treat Harry & Meghan..I perceive Harry is intensely popular also they are treading carefully given his mother's plight and I reckon Meghan is far more popular than the media likes)

## Apparently she got $160,000 for her Australian @60Mins debacle. So she's cleaning up and she got compensation after the first Epstein trial..the one where she never mentioned Andrew.

### be surprising to see how long her lawyers hang on for..they will be doing it on a no-win no fee basis and I reckon it will fizzle out eventually..cost them little so far..Fleet Street is doing all the work for them.
 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
#194074
Jo

Re:False Accusers, Enablers and Greed. 4 Years, 4 Months ago  
Excellent posts, both.

On the possibility of Roberts' story fizzling out, check out James "how to be right" O'Brien cutting off/shouting down three callers sticking up for Prince Andrew. It doesn't look as if the media vilification of him will work with everyone.

 
Logged Logged
  Reply Quote
Go to topPost New TopicPost Reply