Note the subtle lies (by omission) in the quotes. The "persistent misleading of the Court", as referred to by the Judge, applied to the police and CPS. It has been studiously ignored by Surrey Police. They - and, indeed, Hydrant - ignore the "lack of training" by officers investigating. The fact that retired traffic wardens, family liaison officers and transport police were brought back is touched on in the Hydrant Report but only briefly. False accusers are still called "victims" by Surrey Police though proved to be liars.

www.surreycomet.co.uk/news/18056075.dj-j...nisational-failures/

WHAT THE BLOODY HELL IS THIS?

Are they morons? How can they use the phrase "investigating why the case collapsed" when it implies guilt? The phrase should be "investigating why an innocent man was accused and mistreated".

As for referring to "victims" when it has been shown that there were no victims other than YOU, it is, in my opinion, vicious and libellous, and they should be fired.

And... The thickest person I have ever met is a traffic warden. They can shove their traffic wardens!


Sorry. The red mist came down.