IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
TOPIC: A pub with no beer.
|
|
Re:A pub with no beer. 3 Years, 4 Months ago
|
|
The reasoning is curious isn't it? I suppose it must be something to do with alcohol relaxing inhibitions, and people ending up hugging or having carnal relations in the pub car park. Outcomes largely unheard of, I understand, following a coca-cola "session".
Curious because hugging and sex are both good for the health....
Unlike panicdemic; 200 000 deaths projected (UK) and counting.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:A pub with no beer. 3 Years, 4 Months ago
|
|
Green MAn wrote:
[quote][quote] Wyot wrote:
The reasoning is curious isn't it? I suppose it must be something to do with alcohol relaxing inhibitions, and people ending up hugging or having carnal relations in the pub car park. Outcomes largely unheard of, I understand, following a coca-cola "session".
Unlike panicdemic; 200 000 deaths projected (UK) and counting.
They could, if it was really needed, just ban pubs serving drunk people... only I am pretty sure that law already exists and is largely ignored?
I have been club, pub owner and manager in the past Wyot.
Most landlords and staff do ban or stop serving drunks if they believe they are too drunk. It's both public safety and the patrons own safety. They don't automatically ban them unless it's repeated times over, there has been times when a security guard or myself has called a taxi, to send a drunk home and out of our own pocket. Most of them are harmless but it's harm they could do is danger.
The biggest debate is what counts as a substantial meal ? When I'm out shopping for long periods of time I can only just stomach a starter and a dessert.
For those of us with bladders of a certain age, it will be a bit of an expensive chore to buy egg and chips every time we need a wee.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:A pub with no beer. 3 Years, 4 Months ago
|
|
Honey wrote:
[quote] Green MAn wrote:
[quote] Wyot wrote:
The reasoning is curious isn't it? I suppose it must be something to do with alcohol relaxing inhibitions, and people ending up hugging or having carnal relations in the pub car park. Outcomes largely unheard of, I understand, following a coca-cola "session".
Unlike panicdemic; 200 000 deaths projected (UK) and counting.
They could, if it was really needed, just ban pubs serving drunk people... only I am pretty sure that law already exists and is largely ignored?
I have been club, pub owner and manager in the past Wyot.
Most landlords and staff do ban or stop serving drunks if they believe they are too drunk. It's both public safety and the patrons own safety. They don't automatically ban them unless it's repeated times over, there has been times when a security guard or myself has called a taxi, to send a drunk home and out of our own pocket. Most of them are harmless but it's harm they could do is danger.
The biggest debate is what counts as a substantial meal ? When I'm out shopping for long periods of time I can only just stomach a starter and a dessert.
For those of us with bladders of a certain age, it will be a bit of an expensive chore to buy egg and chips every time we need a wee.
You could always squat over a drain or behind a wall/
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|