So after being a leader in creating the global PanicDemic by believing the media hype in early 2020 (along with Italy, France, Spain and Belgium) and failing to do the obvious (protecting and treating the vulnerable - mainly the elderly), the UK decided masks were "worse than useless", then "only for hospitals", then "obligatory". Meanwhile deaths mounted - mainly the over 80s (who tend to die more than younger people, something the gullibles failed to accept).
Despite leading the world in deaths in ratio to cases, the media told us to clap the NHS. We did. But, even better, our brilliant scientists came up with the first vaccine (media told us), ignoring the US/German Pfizer vaccine which was first. Media failed to admit this was mainly not tested on older people (the main victims). UK hysterical with pride; vaccines more than anywhere.
Then it started to emerge that the Oxford/British vaccine may be only as effective as water. Ignoring that, the UK proudly say they vaccine more than anyone else. Media ignores the fact that Covid19 is, in fact, a trivial virus lethal only to a few (mainly those about to die, such as 100 year olds) and turn surviving 100 year olds into heroes, even when they die.
Everywhere else in the world (except the equally gullible others in the Death Five) the ratio of deaths to cases is tiny, like a bad flu season (which is exactly what Covid19 is). Media continues to exaggerate its "great story", carrying daily death figures, ignoring deaths from cancer, heart attacks etc. Anyone pointing out that in the "wrong vaccine" flu 3 months 2017-18 50,000 died (i.e. 200,000 in a year if the correct vaccine hadn't later been given) in England & Wales alone were called Covidiots and the statistics denied (they were, after all, only WITH flu, not all caused by flu).
Covid death figures (WITH not CAUSED BY) given daily. Weeping relatives interviewed (offending relatives of victims without Covid).
Public happily accepted this, being totally controlled by the media. References to George Orwell ignored. The Two Minute Hate became a two year panic.

But joy, media has now sensed a BETTER story. Oxford vaccine useless!

You couldn't make it all up.

It's funny how the media are debunking anti-vaxxers yet side effects can be worse if you have an allergic reaction. So getting another GP appointment to cure the side effects can be impossible in surgeries especially if they are overwhelmed.

MP's are older than me yet we don't see them having it and has the world leader Klaus Schwab had the vaccine. Of course not he have a placebo vaccine for publicity purposes.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55056016

davidicke.com/2020/10/08/ultimate-proof-...the-new-world-order/


banned.video/watch?id=5fbe601dc77bbc4fc3cbfcd6

I used to hate David Icke but I actually agree with here for the first time. Covid is part of the Great Reset nothing more and nothing else.

I'm getting a bit irritated by the media!

There is no evidence that the Oxford vaccine is not effective in preventing people getting seriously ill; so why the bloody fuss?

Surely ALL that matters is how many people are dying additional to a normal season? That seems to be no one.

I still don't buy the conspiracies GM and note that the statements in the Icke article don't contain links - I just have to take it all on trust; like religion or SAGE apocalypse stats.

Talking of - SAGE are running the country and the PM is too scared to do anything now but follow them.

Do we really think this bunch will relinquish the power they have gained easily? Are we in for a frigging year of looking at R rates against every bloody variant that crops up!?

But "good" news - I tested negative at the weekend as part of the Surrey "surge" testing for the SA variant. Who would have thought...

I would hate to be the guy who says "I told you so".

The Great Reset is all over the WEF website.

I'm as opposed to "the great reset" as I am to the "killer plague". Both media hype.

JK2006 wrote:
I'm as opposed to "the great reset" as I am to the "killer plague". Both media hype.

You won't be able to drive both of your Rolls Royce's soon.

Green Man wrote:
I would hate to be the guy who says "I told you so".

The Great Reset is all over the WEF website.

Yes I know. There is the WEF Great Reset (I think they even named a summit that way last summer?) looking at how things can be done differently post Covid, and the conspiracy theories that also use that phrase and claim Covid was deliberate and directed. Massive difference.

But if I am going to be told "told you so" I hope it is by you GM

Must go, don't want to miss a word of Hancock's press conference this eve I just don't get to see enough of him!

[quote]Wyot wrote:
[quote][, don't want to miss a word of Hancock's press conference this eve I just don't get to see enough of him! :laugh:[/quote]

'Oh, the feeling is the same Mr Wyot. Look, I am imagining this once belonged to you, mmmmmmmmmmmm very tasty. All my love and kisses your faithfully Matt Hand-Cock'

Green Man wrote:
[quote][quote]Wyot wrote:
[, don't want to miss a word of Hancock's press conference this eve I just don't get to see enough of him! :laugh:[/quote]

'Oh, the feeling is the same Mr Wyot. Look, I am imagining this once belonged to you, mmmmmmmmmmmm very tasty. All my love and kisses your faithfully Matt Hand-Cock'



This man is announcing in the commons today that anyone who conceals they have returned to the UK from a Covid red list country will face up to 10 years in prison. Thankfully the judiciary is actually independent in this country, so it won't happen.

But the silly little turd is actually announcing this as our Government's policy.

Anyone out there still who doesn't think things just maybe going a bit far?

Wyot wrote:
This man is announcing in the commons today that anyone who conceals they have returned to the UK from a Covid red list country will face up to 10 years in prison. Thankfully the judiciary is actually independent in this country, so it won't happen.


The independence of the judiciary won't profit the government/parliament from passing binding legislation to that effect.

emile wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:


The independence of the judiciary won't profit the government/parliament from passing binding legislation to that effect.

No but sentencing is independent.

I bet this legislation could be on the statute book 50 years and no judge will sentence anyone to 10 years in prison for this. That's before we even get on to the totally impractical policing of the matter.

The 10 years is just a masturbatory fantasy on Hancock's part.

But what Hancock masturbates to is disturbing.

(The above insight does not require pictures thanks GM...)

Wyot wrote:
sentencing is independent

no judge will sentence anyone to 10 years in prison for this


Independent, to a degree. Although parliament also stipulates sentencing guidelines and sets tariffs for the judiciary to follow.

Almost invariably, judges (in the UK) adhere to the guidelines and laws are enforced on the government's terms - as enacted in Westminster.

Wyot wrote:
[quote]emile wrote:
Wyot wrote:


The independence of the judiciary won't profit the government/parliament from passing binding legislation to that effect.

No but sentencing is independent.

I bet this legislation could be on the statute book 50 years and no judge will sentence anyone to 10 years in prison for this. That's before we even get on to the totally impractical policing of the matter.

The 10 years is just a masturbatory fantasy on Hancock's part.

But what Hancock masturbates to is disturbing.

(The above insight does not require pictures thanks GM...)


'Damn condoms'




'Damn Jizz'

emile wrote:
Wyot wrote:
sentencing is independent

no judge will sentence anyone to 10 years in prison for this


Independent, to a degree. Although parliament also stipulates sentencing guidelines and sets tariffs for the judiciary to follow.

Almost invariably, judges (in the UK) adhere to the guidelines and laws are enforced on the government's terms - as enacted in Westminster.

I expect you will find the sentencing guidelines for this won't start with a presumption of custody of between 3-10 years!

There will be provision for a fine as a sentence. Or some Unpaid Work in the community. Sentencing guidelines list exacerbating factors to justify increasing the tariff.

What on earth could they be?

And this Gov couldn't care less whether anyone is sent to prison for this. This is naked politics to distract from the worst death rate in the world. Look how bloody hard we are!

It is utterly pathetic.

Green Man wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
emile wrote:
Wyot wrote:


The independence of the judiciary won't profit the government/parliament from passing binding legislation to that effect.

No but sentencing is independent.

I bet this legislation could be on the statute book 50 years and no judge will sentence anyone to 10 years in prison for this. That's before we even get on to the totally impractical policing of the matter.

The 10 years is just a masturbatory fantasy on Hancock's part.

But what Hancock masturbates to is disturbing.

(The above insight does not require pictures thanks GM...)


'Damn condoms'




'Damn Jizz'



I was wrong GM. My insight does benefit from this picture; if not my peace of mind...