Isn't there an equivalent to Attempting to Pervert the Course of Justice in America? If there is surely Justice in the States should prosecute this dreadful woman. Carl Beech got 18 years for his lies in the UK. She should be jailed for a similar amount of time (unless, of course, she can prove her claims are true).

If she was raped left right and centre by dozens and in fear of her life, why is she only suing Prince Andrew?

Why does she look so happy in that photo with PA that she reportedly wanted taken so that she could send it to her mum? On that note, what were her parents doing allowing her to gallivant - sorry, be trafficked - overseas? Why didn't she just say no from the outset?

Jay Beecher did a fascinating deep dive and came to one escapable conclusion.

Virginia Guffer or whatever her name is, is a congenital liar. And poor Prince Andrew is caught in the middle of her hunger for money and fame.

vote-watch.com/2021/07/06/prince-andrew-the-shocking-truth/

TBS wrote:
Jay Beecher did a fascinating deep dive and came to one escapable conclusion.

Virginia Guffer or whatever her name is, is a congenital liar. And poor Prince Andrew is caught in the middle of her hunger for money and fame.

vote-watch.com/2021/07/06/prince-andrew-the-shocking-truth/

I think the purpose of these things is to blackmail stupid people who might be of use to you.
Therefore, it is most likely that the girls who are (just) underage are aware of the set up, otherwise they might mention that they were seventeen, not older, as the fool has been led to believe.

Not sure about this. Sounds a bit like his belief that his Newsnight interview went well. Is he deluding himself?

...insiders reportedly claimed Andrew is 'utterly convinced' that he will brush off allegations of rape and sexual assault from Jeffrey Epstein's former sex slave and believes he could return to public life as soon as the Queen's Platinum Jubilee next year.

The Duke of York has reportedly told aides that the scandal surrounding the bombshell lawsuit filed in a US court by Virginia Giuffre will 'blow over' and has earmarked a return to the royal front line in time for Her Majesty's historic milestone anniversary.

Sources quoted by one newspaper described Andrew's 'incredibly bullish' attitude and said he believes there is time to salvage his reputation. Palace sources have insisted the duke will 'not take part' in any of the official celebrations marking the Queen's seven decades on the throne.

One insider close to the royal told The Daily Mirror: 'It is clear he (Andrew) has a clear and burning desire to return to work as soon as possible.

'That may look entirely impossible but if anything he's become emboldened in recent weeks and remains utterly convinced he will not only be exonerated but will certainly forge a way back to public life.

'Certainly he has given the incredibly bullish impression that this will all blow over within a short while, rather than become a protracted issue.'

www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-99728...s-Prince-Andrew.html

completely pissed off with the media who assume on not a scintilla of proof that Andrew is "fleeing" to Balmoral.

The sheer lunacy that any Yank rep could serve a Summons at Windsor Castle, Balmoral or any Royal residence.

## One of my closest pals in Oz is a retired private detective who was an expert on serving summons on the wealthy and famous all over the world including Onassis.

Not only is it incredibly expensive there is always a cut -off point where costs outweigh the results.

One of his famous cases was trying to serve the likeable rogue Alan Bond who after 18 months he tracked down to a lunch in a restaurant but the bank pulled the plug even though he assured them it could be done within the hour as Bond left.."no, we've spent too much. too late" said the bank customer not wishing to spend another $1000.

JK2006 wrote:
Isn't there an equivalent to Attempting to Pervert the Course of Justice in America? If there is surely Justice in the States should prosecute this dreadful woman. Carl Beech got 18 years for his lies in the UK. She should be jailed for a similar amount of time (unless, of course, she can prove her claims are true).

she's the most unlikable "victim" of them all.

an ex-hooker trying to cash in. Husband and kids must be so proud of her.

I predict this matter will not get past first base in a US court. You need a lot more evidence than just claims and US authorities have already said they regard Andrew as a witness only.

Ambulance chasing lawyer and a PR agent..some victim.

and yes why is she suing just Andrew ? (probably because the Epstein estate have tied everything up for years and years.

the very notion a royal would "settle" in such a case is laughable and indicates her goat of a lawyer is completely ignorant of the power of the British establishment.

Andrew's real problem is the UK media don't like him and are using a Trollope to attack him.

I read some tosh about them not being able to serve him papers in The Queen's presence.

Prince Andrew served with papers, accuser's team claims

Lawyers for the woman who has accused Prince Andrew of sexual abuse claim they have successfully served him with legal papers.

Virginia Giuffre has launched a civil case against the prince in New York - and legal papers have to be "served" before the case can proceed.

Her lawyers say they were served on 27 August, being left with a police officer at Windsor's Royal Lodge.

Prince Andrew denies all the claims made by Ms Giuffre.

A spokeswoman representing the Duke of York has declined to comment on the latest development.

A US judge must determine whether the papers were in fact "served" before any case can proceed.

A video conference on the next stages of the case is scheduled for a New York court on Monday.

According to court documents, an answer is due from Prince Andrew to the affidavit by 17 September and "if you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint".

BBC royal correspondent Nicholas Witchell said it was still not clear yet whether Prince Andrew's legal team would accept that legal papers have been served.
If a civil case against Prince Andrew coincides with Ghislaine Maxwell's trial (Judge sets November for start of Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial), I wonder whether the GM trial/media coverage will affect the outcome of the civil case.

On today's BBC news coverage of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial starting, they showed a clip of Virginia Roberts Giuffre (they just can't get enough of her) telling the BBC (judging from the back of the interviewer's head, Darragh MacIntyre) that she felt "sick" when supposedly told by Ghislaine Maxwell that she'd have to do for Prince Andrew what she did for Epstein. She told Australia's 60 Minutes, she felt "absolutely disgusted" when told this. Yet in the photo, which she claims taken when they arrived back from Tramp and just before Prince Andrew abused her, she's smiling, has her arm round Prince Andrew and is leaning into him. She doesn't look "sick" or "absolutely disgusted" at all.

There seems to be conflicting information out there as to whether this woman will testify in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial or just attend as a spectator - no doubt available for comment to the media.