Man arrested before false allegations made against him two days later.
one trial three court case numbers one after the trial,none belonging to the defendant.
convicted, court records altered 6/9months after the trial.
wife having an affair with the defendant's solicitors relation plus arresting officer. two attempts on the man's life by prison officers
told to shut mouth.
every solicitor who came in contact with the prisoner and the documents supplied by the lord chief justices dept. plus the c.o.a. london needed to spend more time with their family or went to live abroad or went into commercial law or another tort.
divorce nisi/absolute plus forged affidavit of means concealed
total time one hour on the friday two hours on the following monday
"what a record".
S.J.decision was given by a non registered judge who had retired and not on the barristers register etc.
man has the documented evidence to support everything.

This is all quite beyond me I'm afraid Scottie but I've put it up as it may make sense to others.

All it does say is that some very bad things are happening to people who cannot cope with it.

And that is, I'm afraid, very true.

Sounds like an extreme case but very believable. One guy at Risley had been represented by a barrister who closed the defence without putting the evidence before the jury. He told the client that it was impossible to appeal against a jury verdict, and refused to have more to do with the case. While in prison this guy approached several solicitors who later ended contact without notice. He said one of them looked very stressed at their last meeting. It's recently been discovered that the entire records of his trial have been destroyed by the court. Another solicitor is now looking at the case, but any future action will have to rely on media coverage of the proceedings. It remains to be seen whether this solicitor will also vanish.

The evidence which the barrister witheld at the trial still exists. There just isn't the machinery to allow it to be heard.