IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
Warboys - Supreme Court attacks police incompetence
TOPIC: Warboys - Supreme Court attacks police incompetence
|
|
Re:Warboys - Supreme Court attacks police incompetence 6 Years, 1 Month ago
|
|
Hopefully the decision of the High court will motivate the police to do a professional job. Which will not cost more in the cases noted as is obvious. General well documented, inquires will give a proper basis to what evidence, facts and so on can be and cannot be established. Also, less inquiries later, such as this supreme court case and so on. Seems crazy that the Metropolitan police need the Supreme Court to tell them to do a professional job before they consider it as the thing to do. Of course, following up on crimes ignored at present will add to the budget but that is what we vote governments in to do. It is their job to ensure a fully operational professional service.
I even wonder about the girl who alleged she was raped earlier highlighted in this blog. I think by four guys and the jury believed the guys. Were their mobiles etc investigated? There may of been missed evidence to support the prosecution case but because the evidence is mainly the word only of the complainant or victim then vital evidence is not only missed for the defense but also for the prosecution. The point is a professional, honest approach for almost all jobs, whether a boss, a cleaner, a judge, gas/electric/phone inquires at a help desk/call centre will often reduce costs and make life better for all well meaning citizens that is.
Sadly I see history yet again repeating itself in that not so long ago with the residential home inquiries (Big time almost 20 years ago now I think), the fishing expeditions and people responding with their story when time has passed and they are approached directly or the item is in the news meant there was no way to really know what was true and what was false, that also applies to Worboys and other cases even when as in Worboys case there was forensic and other reliable evidence to crimes evidentially committed.
I found the Worboys case was in fact a good example of clear reliable evidence "later on that is" when internal police inquiries were made about similar cases with no known connections or no publicity -a number of reported crimes were identified giving evidence against John Worboys then the search of his home and the rape kit plus other items.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Re:Warboys - Supreme Court attacks police incompetence 6 Years, 1 Month ago
|
|
In The Know wrote:
On the one hand you salivate at the police being criticised for failing to persue a prosecution
- yet on other posts (eg Bennell) you criticise them when they do !
What we want is thorough, impartial, transparent investigation - regardless of whether the outcomes produced lean towards prosecution or not. At the moment, police START from a politically-directed desired result and then look for, or take note of, or disclose only what serves that result. John Marsh succinctly describes what should happen instead
wjlmarsh wrote:
Hopefully the decision of the High court will motivate the police to do a professional job. Which will not cost more in the cases noted as is obvious. General well documented, inquires will give a proper basis to what evidence, facts and so on can be and cannot be established. Also, less inquiries later, such as this supreme court case and so on. Seems crazy that the Metropolitan police need the Supreme Court to tell them to do a professional job before they consider it as the thing to do. Of course, following up on crimes ignored at present will add to the budget but that is what we vote governments in to do. It is their job to ensure a fully operational professional service.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|