Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Max Clifford in court for sex abuse of 14/15 year old girls
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
hedda |
his comments after your case and the attack upon Cowell and the intimidation of him to denounce you demonstrate a particularly nasty streak.
Everybody is entitled to ask for bail and ask friends or family to assist and there should be no demonizing of those who post it.
So in this case yes, Karma has kicked in. Nasty sod. |
|
JK2006 |
Can the BBC reporter really be called Todger?
www.internetslang.com/TODGER-meaning-definition.asp |
|
JK2006 |
It depends whether or not he's guilty Pru. If he is, he'll be feeling "I got away with it so long, and thought my high profile charity work and loud condemnation of other paedophiles would have protected me, but it didn't, so this is the fight of my life... better make sure my hair looks nice in March"... If he's innocent (and we must all presume that, mustn't we?) perhaps, just perhaps, he's wondering whether we were innocent too. In which case I expect an apologetic phone call shortly. |
|
Pru |
I doubt anyone believes the creep. It would be great to think he's finally realising what he's put others through but I fear he's just as impervious as ever. |
|
JK2006 |
I see, as Max describes the alleged abused young girls as "anonymous", he wants to give the impression that he doesn't know who they are. That must surely be false. Defendants have to be given all details in order to prepare their defence. They do, naturally, remain anonymous for reporting purposes (so, in my mind, should the accused - if that had been the case 13 years ago I'd never have been charged, let alone convicted). But, then, blurring the facts is a part of Max's business. |
|
|
|
