cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: The Detective Who never Was
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Pru bh wrote:
No way of checking things? Wrong.

Okay, in future, just for you, I'll add a large banner saying 'I'm being sarcastic' when I'm obviously being sarcastic.
bh No way of checking things? Wrong. In this cretins case, it can be done.
Put him on the spot with a high profile chat show host & see if he squirms & do invite some members of his old unit. They'd destroy him.
Pru Oh he moved in a glamorous circle: Jeffrey Archer was around, lecturing at the University of Oxford, Gordon Ramsay was playing professional football, Max Clifford was managing The Beatles, Uri Geller was spying for the CIA and little Williams Thomas was driving around with Starsky and Hutch. It's just a shame there's no way of checking on all these things.
Dodgy Dan Ace investigator Moor Larkin has uncovered more proof about the ex-policeman who claims he was a detective in the Surrey Police.
However this time the proof is indisputable.

It comes from Surrey Police's own report into their previous investigation about Savile which has been mis-represented in the media - Operation Outreach where the self proclaimed "detective and child protection expert " is described as an "ex-Surrey Police Constable".

That cannot possibly be a mistake given the importance of the investigation into an investigation which concluded that the original claims about Savile required No Further Action was the correct outcome.

How much longer can this person be pandered to when he falsifies his credentials in such a very serious matter like the protection of children ?

This is a matter that must be taken up with any new Press Council , if it actually gets off the ground. Or are the media now going to accept, say a nurse claiming they are a Medical Doctor?

jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/call-my-bluff.html
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2025 King of Hits.co.uk