cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: My letter to the Lord Chief Justice about the Stuart Hall appeal decision
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 Doubt it Honey; they would never have dropped the rape charge if there was evidence - these must be more recent allegations provoked by the publicity.
honey!oh sugar sugar. Anon wrote:
JK2006 wrote:
And the problem being the same as in your post, Anon; people (including Judges) tend to latch onto the simplistic headlines without looking at the detail. It seems only TWO girls (so far) have claimed all these rapes. "Please, Uncle Stuart, can I come round to be raped again?".

Ah it's the same two claiming several rapes each. Well as they say, once is unlucky, twice is terribly unlucky, 3 times is downright stupidity. I suppose I don't know the circumstances, but still... Where were they a few months ago when the police were building their case? It stinks to high heaven...


I am speculating that Hall pleaded guilty in a "deal" to avoid the "rape" charges (if it was an affair there are probably witnesses) and once he was safely jailed they charged him anyway.
Is this possible?
Anon JK2006 wrote:
And the problem being the same as in your post, Anon; people (including Judges) tend to latch onto the simplistic headlines without looking at the detail. It seems only TWO girls (so far) have claimed all these rapes. "Please, Uncle Stuart, can I come round to be raped again?".

Ah it's the same two claiming several rapes each. Well as they say, once is unlucky, twice is terribly unlucky, 3 times is downright stupidity. I suppose I don't know the circumstances, but still... Where were they a few months ago when the police were building their case? It stinks to high heaven...
honey!oh sugar sugar. JK2006 wrote:
And the problem being the same as in your post, Anon; people (including Judges) tend to latch onto the simplistic headlines without looking at the detail. It seems only TWO girls (so far) have claimed all these rapes. "Please, Uncle Stuart, can I come round to be raped again?".


Because children are willing doesn't necessarily mean it isn't rape, but in this case It was probably the girl who had a relationship with him. (Her "story" was in the newspapers)
JK2006 And the problem being the same as in your post, Anon; people (including Judges) tend to latch onto the simplistic headlines without looking at the detail. It seems only TWO girls (so far) have claimed all these rapes. "Please, Uncle Stuart, can I come round to be raped again?".