cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Be afraid....
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
In The Know Chris

Isn't it up to the Jury to decide what is "offensive" (a decision which they will obviously take in the light of current acceptable material?)
Chris Retro The lack of clear guidelines as to what constitutes such material is proof this law (and probably the proliferation of smartphones etc) is there solely to criminalise people.
As far as I know they can, if they wish, label ANY pictures of children illegal. Clothed or unclothed it doesn't matter - and yet as far as I am aware there has been no debate on this, public or otherwise. If someone wants to label pictures dodgy, it seems they will do - the end.
In The Know Read this, Angel -

www.independent.co.uk/news/naked-child-p...rethink-1525634.html
In The Know Angel,

At the back of my mind I seem to remember a case some time ago where pics of naked children (in the garden in their playpool) caused a processing firm (I think it was SupaSnaps from memory) to call in the police, resulting in raids / computer removal etc before the matter was resolved.
Angel Seriously? Maybe I should wipe the innocent naked pics of my kids off my computer.

www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/crim...-hand-shop-1-3155137