King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

[b]MCR Media wrote:[/b]
[quote]http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jimmy-saviles-chauffeur-charged-serious-2594874

Jimmy Savile's chauffeur charged with serious sex offences against 15 young girls between 1962 and 1996
25 Oct 2013 23:30
Source: Mirror
  
Jimmy Savile's former flatmate and chauffeur has been charged with a series of serious sex offences against young girls, it has emerged.

Ray Teret, 72, is charged with a total of 32 offences involving 15 different victims who accuse him of sexual abuse between 1962 and 1996.

The alleged offences were committed primarily in the Greater Manchester area.

Teret, of Altrincham, Greater Manchester was charged with 15 counts of rape of a female under 16, one count of rape, one count of attempted rape of a female under 16, six counts of indecent assault of a female under 16, three counts of indecent assault of a female under 14 and one count of gross indecency with a child under 13.

He also faces two counts of conspiracy to rape a girl under 16, one count of possession of extreme pornography, one count of possession of prohibited images and one count of possession of an indecent image of a child.

He is due to appear at Manchester City Magistrates Court on Saturday morning.

A spokesman for Greater Manchester Police said: "A 71 year-old-man was re-arrested in connection with historic sexual offences against children when he answered his bail on Wednesday October 23.

"He was also further arrested in connection with a number of other historic sex offences against children.

"He remains in police custody for questioning."

DCI Graham Brock of Greater Manchester Police said: “This has been a complex investigation that was originally launched in October 2012 when an initial complaint was made to Greater Manchester Police.

“Since that time, we have carried out extensive and wide-ranging inquiries and interviewed a number of people as part of that investigation.

“It has been important those inquiries were carried out thoroughly so that, in consultation with the Crown Prosecution Service, we have been able to secure a number of charges.

“We will continue to support all those women who have come forward and offer them whatever welfare they need through the use of specially-trained officers.”

As part of the investigation into Teret, William Harper, 65, of Stretford, Greater Manchester was charged with conspiracy to rape a girl under 16 and attempt rape of a female under the age of 16 and Alan Ledger, 62, of of Altrincham was charged with indecent assault of a female under 16 and aiding and abetting the rape of a female under 16.

Both Harper and Ledger are due to appear before Manchester City Magistrates' Court on 30 October.

Teret was arrested and bailed in November last year with another man on suspicion of historic rape following an investigation into three separate claims of sexual abuse.

Police emphasised that the accusations were not linked to the national inquiry into abuse by disgraced TV presenter Savile, with whom Teret worked and once shared a flat.[/quote]

Enter code here

Topic History of: Ray Teret charged with 15 serious sex offences against young girls
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Anon	JK2006 wrote: One of the many funny moments during my fiasco of 13 years ago was when the investigating police (who were later so helpful to witnesses being interviewed) produced the only obscene photo they had found in my house, of a young boy in his swimming trunks on a beach, and asked me... "Who is this boy?". Their faces when I told them... "Me". Lol, who did they think it was likely to be? What are they going to do ban cameras on beaches now? Burn all the old family photos from 20+ years ago? I don't know...
JK2006	One of the many funny moments during my fiasco of 13 years ago was when the investigating police (who were later so helpful to witnesses being interviewed) produced the only obscene photo they had found in my house, of a young boy in his swimming trunks on a beach, and asked me... "Who is this boy?". Their faces when I told them... "Me".
Anon	Pattaya wrote: 'one count of possession of extreme pornography, one count of possession of prohibited images and one count of possession of an indecent image of a child.' We just don't have enough detail to comment on the main charges,but 'extreme pornography' could be something as simple as anal sex.The other two charges may well have included as Chris says non pornographic child images.These are possibly thrown in to pretend they have some 'real proof',not just some false allegations,leading to compensation claims. What's an 'indecent image of a child'? - there's several of me in my mum's house in the bath, getting my nappy changed, skinny dipping at the beach... You'd think they'd have to be worse than that wouldn't you? Though these days i'm not so sure... 38
Pattaya	'one count of possession of extreme pornography, one count of possession of prohibited images and one count of possession of an indecent image of a child.' We just don't have enough detail to comment on the main charges,but 'extreme pornography' could be something as simple as anal sex.The other two charges may well have included as Chris says non pornographic child images.These are possibly thrown in to pretend they have some 'real proof',not just some false allegations,leading to compensation claims.
Anon	Chris Retro wrote: Robbie - as to 'images' I refer you to the other thread on here. An "image" need not be in any way illegal as they are looking for mud to stick.. Images of children need not be explicit, sexual or even actually of children at all. Images of 'extreme' pornography may be actually from LEGAL websites. Etc. What makes a picture of a child 'illegal'? Would you know an anonymous naked 19 yr old from a 15 yr old? Or a 23 yr old from a 15 yr old? What makes a photograph of 'a person' sexual or deviant? Investigation - trawling for 12 months. That's all devices and electrical equipment seized - phones, computers etc. All 'contacts' - numbers, email addresses, names - contacted at random and possibly inconvenient times, sometimes more than once - told they will be 'believed' (*ie compensated/sponsored) if they want to make an allegation. The police work on the basis that they will incriminate said individual. The CPS work on the basis any prosecution has to succeed by any means necessary. I'll leave people to make their own minds up as to how "fair" this kind of "investigation" is. My feelings is most real people would not withstand such attention, let alone old men caught up in a multi-million pound national witch hunt. My opinion is that is indeed balderdash - call it an 'educated guess' if yew like... There is no way I would be able to stand that much humiliation and intrusion, even if in the end they found absolutely nothing 'incriminating' - it's the thought of all your acquaintances being contacted, however casual and all your private business being raked though and exposed - no one would want that innocent or guilty...