King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: At last; a jury accepts that media publicity provokes false allegations
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Anon	Gnomo wrote: What is the Law now? - can the accusers be named? You presumably know who your accusers were JK - have you been able to follow their careers since your trial? - I know one starred in a documentary for money, but anyone else able to cash in or exploit their status as a 'believed accuser' They can be named if they are prosecuted and found guilty of making malicious complaints I think, not sure otherwise though...
honey!oh sugar sugar.	Gnomo wrote: What is the Law now? - can the accusers be named? You presumably know who your accusers were JK - have you been able to follow their careers since your trial? - I know one starred in a documentary for money, but anyone else able to cash in or exploit their status as a 'believed accuser' I think one of them was on Kilroy.
Gnomo	What is the Law now? - can the accusers be named? You presumably know who your accusers were JK - have you been able to follow their careers since your trial? - I know one starred in a documentary for money, but anyone else able to cash in or exploit their status as a 'believed accuser'
Foz	A waste of taxpayers and Roache's money and I expect he won't even bother trying to sue for his considerable costs as the accusers will, no doubt, cry bankruptcy and slope off into undeserved anonimity.
honey!oh sugar sugar.	JK2006 wrote: Several of DLT's character witnesses offered to appear on my behalf; my lawyers rejected them as it would just "irritate" the judge. Never mind "irritate" He needed a slap!