King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: NatWest to be sued by Savile trust?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
JK2006	Very well put article; strange that these days we have to go to the Internet (and Australia, where we used to send our convicts) to read the truth - and a story that really should be all over responsible British broadsheets.
Not ITK	hardcastleintel.blogspot.com.au/ 'Savilisation' of Britain puts your inheritance at risk "When then UK Metropolitan Police Commander Peter Spindler announced in 2013 that the late disc jockey Jimmy Savile had "groomed a nation" he set off a firestorm of media outrage. This was an irresistible headline grabbing statement that any show-biz publicist would have given their right arm to have produced."
Chris Retro	New 'Exposure' fresh off the blocks - and as topical as ever
honey!oh sugar sugar.	JK2006 wrote: And the sudden, co-incidental publication of this report… looks suspiciously like organised publicity. I love this direct quote "Three-quarters of victims interviewed did not realise as children that they had been sexually abused by the late DJ, the report found." Am I the only person to think there might be several reasons for this, including the possibility that they had NOT been abused? And everyone carries on as if its perfectly normal to not know you were abused for forty years.
JK2006	And the sudden, co-incidental publication of this report… looks suspiciously like organised publicity. I love this direct quote "Three-quarters of victims interviewed did not realise as children that they had been sexually abused by the late DJ, the report found." Am I the only person to think there might be several reasons for this, including the possibility that they had NOT been abused?