King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: PC Blakelock murder trial - does anyone have any faith ?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
In The Know (as always)	I find this particularly disturbing - == The new inquiry faced a dilemma in trying to get witness accounts of the attack on PC Blakelock because the prosecution needed witnesses who were close enough to see clearly what happened. As some of them may have taken part themselves - making them liable for possible prosecution - the police and the Crown Prosecution Service decided to pursue those who they believed had weapons as suspects and regard unarmed attackers who punched and kicked as witnesses. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-26423811 == Yet again it shows the CPS working with the police in trying to "cobble together" a case ... when their job is to independently oversee an investigation and decide whether there is evidence to prosecute, and It could be interpreted as "doing deals" with lesser criminals in order to "secure" the desired evidence (ie procure the "evidence" which at present does not exist). I'm sure the Court of Appeal will agree with me !!!!
In The Know (as always)	After the initial inquiries - 359 were arrested and most interviewed without lawyers present - four people were charged and convicted. The Court of Appeal overturned the verdict - doubting police notes made at the time. Two police officers were charged with perverting the course of justice - but acquitted (LOL !) Now .. a new trial ... 10 people arrested but only one has been charged. Does anyone have any faith in the outcome? Isn't it clearly the case that they will prosecute anyone until someone take the blame ?