King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

[b]Microscope wrote:[/b]
[quote]Good piece, but I found the following part jarred :

[quote]I'm 100% supportive of the Guardian campaign to stop rape and to lock up real rapists. Not just violent rape. My personal morality dictates that it's wrong to get a woman into bed by telling her you love her when you don't[/quote]

It comes across to me as though you are suggesting that men who have sex with women and don't commit to them 100% are rapists who deserve to be locked up.

I would guess that a majority of false rape accusations currently are of that nature (the woman feels cheated that she let a man have sex with her too easily, thinking he was more comitted to her than he was).

It would certainly be a novel way to cut down on the number of false rape accusations.  Then again, by inflating the definition of rape so ludicrously, it would leave just about any man open to a rape conviction.

What next, stoning to death for adultory?

What about women who 'promise to love, honour, and obey' their husbands, demand 100% exclusive committment for years or decades, and then dump him for a richer man, taking the kids with her, as well as half of his income?

Should they be considered rapists, or something akin to rapists?[/quote]

Enter code here

Topic History of: My Inside Time page this month...
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Anon	honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: Chris Retro wrote: Slater & Moron getting in on the act now too (quelle surprise) Liz Dux - S&G ‏@LizDuxLawyer 4h Convicted paedophile Jonathan King claims Savile was innocent .Not content with traumatising his own victims,he wants to distress others . It is worrying when a lawyer thinks it is acceptable to convict without trial! Can she honestly say she knows otherwise? Noo...
hedda	Chris Retro wrote: Slater & Moron getting in on the act now too (quelle surprise) Liz Dux - S&G ‏@LizDuxLawyer 4h Convicted paedophile Jonathan King claims Savile was innocent .Not content with traumatising his own victims,he wants to distress others . I must say reading Liz Dux' stream of Twitters boasting of her success with the Savile estate makes me feel quite ill. Why has it not dawned upon anyone that anyone can now have their estate successfully challenged ?- just wait until they die
honey!oh sugar sugar.	Chris Retro wrote: Slater & Moron getting in on the act now too (quelle surprise) Liz Dux - S&G ‏@LizDuxLawyer 4h Convicted paedophile Jonathan King claims Savile was innocent .Not content with traumatising his own victims,he wants to distress others . It is worrying when a lawyer thinks it is acceptable to convict without trial!
Chris Retro	Slater & Moron getting in on the act now too (quelle surprise) Liz Dux - S&G ‏@LizDuxLawyer 4h Convicted paedophile Jonathan King claims Savile was innocent .Not content with traumatising his own victims,he wants to distress others .
honey!oh sugar sugar.	Chris Retro wrote: I see John-Thomas (the gift to satire that just keeps on giving) has denounced "Paedophile King" for defending "another Child Abuser" and even brought old Adolf into the equation! Gosh. Wouldn't you think someone calling themselves a child protection expert would check the definition of "paedophile" and read the article before commenting? However, the prison piece was unfortunately written so it could be easily distorted and you cant blame ordinary folk for getting the wrong impression about Mr king's view.