King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: My Inside Time page this month...
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Anon	honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: Chris Retro wrote: Slater & Moron getting in on the act now too (quelle surprise) Liz Dux - S&G ‏@LizDuxLawyer 4h Convicted paedophile Jonathan King claims Savile was innocent .Not content with traumatising his own victims,he wants to distress others . It is worrying when a lawyer thinks it is acceptable to convict without trial! Can she honestly say she knows otherwise? Noo...
hedda	Chris Retro wrote: Slater & Moron getting in on the act now too (quelle surprise) Liz Dux - S&G ‏@LizDuxLawyer 4h Convicted paedophile Jonathan King claims Savile was innocent .Not content with traumatising his own victims,he wants to distress others . I must say reading Liz Dux' stream of Twitters boasting of her success with the Savile estate makes me feel quite ill. Why has it not dawned upon anyone that anyone can now have their estate successfully challenged ?- just wait until they die
honey!oh sugar sugar.	Chris Retro wrote: Slater & Moron getting in on the act now too (quelle surprise) Liz Dux - S&G ‏@LizDuxLawyer 4h Convicted paedophile Jonathan King claims Savile was innocent .Not content with traumatising his own victims,he wants to distress others . It is worrying when a lawyer thinks it is acceptable to convict without trial!
Chris Retro	Slater & Moron getting in on the act now too (quelle surprise) Liz Dux - S&G ‏@LizDuxLawyer 4h Convicted paedophile Jonathan King claims Savile was innocent .Not content with traumatising his own victims,he wants to distress others .
honey!oh sugar sugar.	Chris Retro wrote: I see John-Thomas (the gift to satire that just keeps on giving) has denounced "Paedophile King" for defending "another Child Abuser" and even brought old Adolf into the equation! Gosh. Wouldn't you think someone calling themselves a child protection expert would check the definition of "paedophile" and read the article before commenting? However, the prison piece was unfortunately written so it could be easily distorted and you cant blame ordinary folk for getting the wrong impression about Mr king's view.