King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Waxie Maxie - dodgy defence...
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Chris Retro	JK2006 wrote: "Good honest filth"? I must say, Waxie Maxie's defence is very odd indeed. For a skillful publicist, he's taking some very peculiar stances. And talking of peculiar stances, am I the only one wondering why he waddles in such a strange way? Piles must be a distinct possibility. Didn't that strange Nunnmpty chap on YouTube last year claim it was due to the fact that he is nursing a permanent semi?
JK2006	"Good honest filth"? I must say, Waxie Maxie's defence is very odd indeed. For a skillful publicist, he's taking some very peculiar stances. And talking of peculiar stances, am I the only one wondering why he waddles in such a strange way? Piles must be a distinct possibility.
In The Know	honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: Well, it can only be small, medium or large ... and the small ones DO get larger sometimes, honey!
JK2006	One man or woman's small can be another's massive and, as I've said, the evidence was intended to illustrate behaviour, not detail or opinion. A foolish and misguided argument by the defence.
honey!oh sugar sugar.	From the guardian.... "The defence counsel Richard Horwell QC told the jury there had been "contradictory" evidence about the size of Clifford's penis - ranging from claims it was "freakishly small" to others stating it was "enormous" - that had caught out prosecution witnesses" Well, it can only be small, medium or large so you could say anything and have a one in three chance of being right and your evidence "corroborated" the whole thing is a load of tosh!