IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Topic History of: lawmaker doesn't understand justice Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author
Message
In The Know
lady hedda wrote: I'm eagerly awaiting the arrival of HRH Prince George
It's getting worse by the minute !
Try reading the Express, dear - they always have a story about dementia !
lady hedda
In The Know wrote: honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: Well, to be fair, if the police are branding him guilty simply because they say so, there is not much hope for anyone else thinking it isn't true.
Perhaps Savile should have a trial - a la Blakelock - I'm sure that if there is no evidence the police will be able to create some !
btw .. Baroness Hedda?
Getting very worried about him (her?) .... first it was cross-dressing / then a mobility scooter ... oh dear !
I'm eagerly awaiting the arrival of HRH Prince George
In The Know
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: Well, to be fair, if the police are branding him guilty simply because they say so, there is not much hope for anyone else thinking it isn't true.
Perhaps Savile should have a trial - a la Blakelock - I'm sure that if there is no evidence the police will be able to create some !
btw .. Baroness Hedda?
Getting very worried about him (her?) .... first it was cross-dressing / then a mobility scooter ... oh dear !
Learned Lefty
21st Century VICTIMS. UK Justice & Journalism, Serial Gang-Raped Daily - In Plain Sight !
Just blocked someone who is apparently campaigning for 'justice for Jimmy Savile'
Reply
Retweet
Favorite"
apparently all it takes for the lovely Baroness is hundreds of repetitive tabloid reports for something to be fact.
But the real fact that Jimmy Savile died an innocent man and all the sensational allegations are never to be investigated (except by Anna Raccoon , Moor Larkin and a few others) by police is of no interest.
Sums up the quality of today's vacuous politicians- incapable of deep or original thought.
Well, to be fair, if the police are branding him guilty simply because they say so, there is not much hope for anyone else thinking it isn't true.
which proves my point- we have an idiot in the House Of Lords who hasn't yet got it through her thick skull that the police don't actually have any constituted power (the thing she votes upon) to declare anyone guilty.
Yet she simply goes along with this blatant unconstitutional act. What hope is there?