King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Anna Raccoon's smoking gun
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
JK2006	It is an absolutely fascinating and detailed piece of forensic evidence. What disturbs me is not so much the Establishment opposition to examining the facts but the media silence. Why? Not because I think they ought to be discovering the truth. They don't care about that and never have. But because it's a great story. And that always used to be their prime motive. And the public? I think their 5 seconds of interest in anything passed years ago. They are even, now, getting bored with Max Clifford.
corevalue	Jim the statement is backed up by documentary evidence in the form of the files from the school at the time, now held by Barnados. Anna Raccoon asked for her file as was astonished by the amount of detail - she talks about it in her blog under "personal lives". I assume the Susan character has done the same. This was an "approved" school, 15 staff and only 20 inmates. and a locked facility. What I find truly shocking is that the Met appear to be blocking this evidence being forwarded to the Dame Smith enquiry.
hedda	as always a fascinating read. Raccoon, Moor Larkin and rabbitaway make Fleet St look like amateurs. Bet they read her as well.
JK2006	Yes it's almost beyond belief Jim; she tracked down the original girl who invited Savile to Duncroft. This is her story. Streets above the current standard of investigation and reporting. You'll be boggled by Parts Three and Four.
Jim	Sorry to be an ignoramus, but I can't see a source for any of this. What have I missed. Obviously there must be some proof that she didn't just make it up. I guess I should have been following more closely. Sorry.