cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: BBC - DLT/Savile/JK
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
hedda Chris Retro wrote:
I'm afraid I cannot respond as I neither know - nor recognise - any "paedophile sympathisers". Nor do I communicate with such dimwitted arseholes in 140 characters or less, that's not my style. Twitter is bizarre enough without entering into trading insults with Daleks.

It may have upset The Great Deceiver, granted - or it may be Lizzie's brave 'Rolf Harris' campaign, and there were some JS-related Anna Raccoon blogs being tweeted today, and then there's this - Moor Larkin's latest. MWT doesn't come very well out of this one at all. jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/...ant-infirmation.html


as I keep saying : he is a road crash on the way to happen.

Cannot reveal names but I know someone who is suing a freelance hack for libel after they made a very similar claim on Facebook : because the litigant questioned a recent conviction they were a "supporter of child abuse and an enabler"

Having seen some of the legal letters- the defamer has been told that unless they make a retraction and apology they will be sued for libel and even when they make that apology they must still pay legal costs to date of £10K.

And if they don't pay up a lien will be put on their house.

I shall report how this matter goes but you can see the difficulty the defamer is in- they can get out cheaply at 10 grand or risk maybe £100K plus in costs and grief.

I predict much more of this in the future but the main fact here is : the accuser has property therefore accessible money if a court case happens and I know this lawyer- he is swift on these liens on homes.

## that is why most of those ratbags accusing all & sundry of vile crimes : the Spiveys, Icke, Bill Maloney are basically potless, live in rented flats or council flats.

Of course MWT has a laid a groundwork of making rather sweeping accusations and also pointed ones : accusing Anna Raccoon, JK etc etc.

No sane hack would do this & he has stated that providing a secure home for his children is a motivation. Freud would agrees with me (he used to pick my mind for tips) people who are not bright often reveal their inner fears in strange ways.
sk39 Again i fear for anyone who has been successful in their lives that they are judged and tried before they even have there day in court, the fact the zionistic bbc wishes to censor its programming in line with witch hunts and media pressue shows exactly that the corperation is not transparent! Im busy now tearing my licence up lol
hedda Her wrote:
Is it not double standards when the BBC thought it was OK to have a convicted murderer on one of their soaps, namely Dirty Den?? Silly me, rumours and grabbing someone's tits is much more serious than taking someone's life. I do not have a problem with Lesley Grantham getting on with his life btw, just pointing out double standards!

I welcome media outlets giving reformed (?) murderers a chance just as the News of the World hired a journalist who had drowned his wife in the bath.

the problem is as you point out, they are selective about who they decide to persecute.

Basically..cowards.
JK2006 www.kingofhits.co.uk/index.php/Attitudes...-BBC-censorship.html
Her Is it not double standards when the BBC thought it was OK to have a convicted murderer on one of their soaps, namely Dirty Den?? Silly me, rumours and grabbing someone's tits is much more serious than taking someone's life. I do not have a problem with Lesley Grantham getting on with his life btw, just pointing out double standards!