King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

[b]John Marsh wrote:[/b]
[quote]ITK says[i]	Agree entirely -

BUT it IS a step in the right direction.
Izwail will never give ground until forced to.[/i]
hedda  says[i]	Galloway..

members5.boardhost.com/medialens/msg/1413277762.html

"However, unfortunately I cannot support this motion as it accepts recognition of the state of Israel, does not define borders of either state or address the central question of the right of return of the millions of Palestinians who have been forced to live outside Palestine." [/i]

Have noted George Gallaway appears to give these matters some thought. He appears on the surface to be one sided the other way. The more that Palestine is recognised as a state the less opportunity and support the land stealers of Israel can keep getting away with their land grab. Even a chance to return some land. Gearge says he supports one state only and I accept in an ideal world this is great. Just as Ireland been united again. Northern Ireland is really kinda of isolated. But people are not that adaptable and so as ITK says a separat state is a step in the right direction. I would have liked Salmondre Scotland to have had a whole plan for jobs, housing, social care , currency, banking for the Scottish people that would of gripped the people in changing but his whole goal was separation. Thet is so old fashion. It is nationalism and not a problem solving approach. But in Palestine nationalism is needed at this stage to give them freedom to be self determinant.[/quote]

Enter code here

Topic History of: These 12 should hang their heads in shame
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
John Marsh	ITK says Agree entirely - BUT it IS a step in the right direction. Izwail will never give ground until forced to. hedda says Galloway.. members5.boardhost.com/medialens/msg/1413277762.html "However, unfortunately I cannot support this motion as it accepts recognition of the state of Israel, does not define borders of either state or address the central question of the right of return of the millions of Palestinians who have been forced to live outside Palestine." Have noted George Gallaway appears to give these matters some thought. He appears on the surface to be one sided the other way. The more that Palestine is recognised as a state the less opportunity and support the land stealers of Israel can keep getting away with their land grab. Even a chance to return some land. Gearge says he supports one state only and I accept in an ideal world this is great. Just as Ireland been united again. Northern Ireland is really kinda of isolated. But people are not that adaptable and so as ITK says a separat state is a step in the right direction. I would have liked Salmondre Scotland to have had a whole plan for jobs, housing, social care , currency, banking for the Scottish people that would of gripped the people in changing but his whole goal was separation. Thet is so old fashion. It is nationalism and not a problem solving approach. But in Palestine nationalism is needed at this stage to give them freedom to be self determinant.
In The Know (as always)	Agree entirely - BUT it IS a step in the right direction. Izwail will never give ground until forced to.
hedda	Galloway.. members5.boardhost.com/medialens/msg/1413277762.html "However, unfortunately I cannot support this motion as it accepts recognition of the state of Israel, does not define borders of either state or address the central question of the right of return of the millions of Palestinians who have been forced to live outside Palestine."
In The Know (as always)	The 12 MPs who voted against were made up of six Tories (Mr Offord, Bob Blackman, Jonathan Djanogly, Mike Freer, Nigel Mills and Robert Syms), five Democratic Unionists (Nigel Dodds, William McCrea, Ian Paisley, Jim Shannon and David Simpson) and a Liberal Democrat (Sir Alan Beith). news.sky.com/story/1352283/mps-vote-to-r...se-palestinian-state ... maybe their constituents will have something to say about it ?