cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Stephen Fry on Savile
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Jo hedda wrote:
Fry is spot on yet is still making that leap of logic- that Savile is guilty of everything claimed because a 1000 newspaper reports have said so.

Yet Savile has not been investigated and never will be.


The questions asked here now seem to be taboo.
Pru JK2006 wrote:
A very foolish remark from Stephen - especially as he was at the dinner two years ago when I really had a go at Gambo for spouting off about Savile. I shall find out why he said it next time we meet.

He'll probably say the opposite then. In other people it's called contrariness or muddleheadedness. In Fry, the most over-indulged and over-praised celeb in metropolitan culture, it's treated as genius.
honey!oh sugar sugar. JK2006 wrote:
A very foolish remark from Stephen - especially as he was at the dinner two years ago when I really had a go at Gambo for spouting off about Savile. I shall find out why he said it next time we meet.

He is not a stupid man, so there is probably a good reason.
JK2006 A very foolish remark from Stephen - especially as he was at the dinner two years ago when I really had a go at Gambo for spouting off about Savile. I shall find out why he said it next time we meet.
hedda Jim wrote:
Try this.

some pretty wacky comments from readers.

Fry is spot on yet is still making that leap of logic- that Savile is guilty of everything claimed because a 1000 newspaper reports have said so.

Yet Savile has not been investigated and never will be.