IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
|
|
Topic History of: so many contradictions Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
hedda |
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
Jo wrote:
psychiatric illness now being used as excuse for false claim although I've never heard depression used as reason for false claims. Psychosis yes
The way I read it, psychiatric illness is being given as the reason why she should not have been prosecuted over a false claim, not as an excuse for making a false claim.
The way I read it (Mail) is that some poor woman was raped but because of her mental illness the police (even though they believed her and was sure she was raped) thought it was kinder not to put her through the trial, especially as the poor thing gave conflicting evidence (due to her illness of course, not that it never happened)
Then the brute rapist prosecuted her and forced her to kill herself 
the most crucial part of that report is :
"However, for undisclosed reasons, the CPS decided to take over the prosecution"
my spooky feeling is that Dad will discover some unpalatable truths about his daughter. |
honey!oh sugar sugar. |
JK2006 wrote:
Even the maddest rapist wouldn't sue the victim after her claims were rejected by police, surely, Honey? It seems more likely that an innocent man was so infuriated by her suggestion that he felt he needed vengeance or justice. Or, as is usual in these cases, misunderstandings by one or both parties got revised in memory. Either way, the law should not ever allow such things to proceed and, indeed, in this case it sounds like it WAS stopped. Should have ended there.
Yes. I know. I was being sarcastic, because i felt that was the theme they tried to convey. The wording implied that he was actually a rapist (using terms like alleged rapist when it wasn't even in court) and stressing that police believed her (what does it matter if they believe or not? Only evidence counts, and it was conflicting)
It is a horrible horrible article. |
andrew |
JK2006 wrote:
Even the maddest rapist wouldn't sue the victim after her claims were rejected by police, surely, Honey? It seems more likely that an innocent man was so infuriated by her suggestion that he felt he needed vengeance or justice. Or, as is usual in these cases, misunderstandings by one or both parties got revised in memory. Either way, the law should not ever allow such things to proceed and, indeed, in this case it sounds like it WAS stopped. Should have ended there.
When will people report that women commit statutory rape, fuck their student and download images etc ? |
In The Know (as always) |
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
The way I read it (Mail) is that some poor woman was raped but because of her mental illness the police (even though they believed her and was sure she was raped) thought it was kinder not to put her through the trial, especially as the poor thing gave conflicting evidence (due to her illness of course, not that it never happened)
Then the brute rapist prosecuted her and forced her to kill herself 
Eleanor de Freitas, 23, killed herself in April - three days before she was due to stand trial at Southwark Crown Court accused of making up an allegation of rape against a man.
The CPS decided to prosecute her after the man reportedly spent £200,000 on a private prosecution.
The A-grade student, who had bipolar disorder, left her family a note blaming her fear of giving evidence as a motive for her suicide.
Lawyers for her family had called on the coroner to postpone a inquest into her death so that an inquiry can be carried out into whether the CPS decision to prosecute Miss de Freitas contributed to her death.
news.sky.com/story/1368726/fake-rape-cas...igated-after-suicide
She was clearly not "too afraid to give evidence" when she thought she was pressing charges against someone !!!!!!! |
In The Know (as always) |
[b]honey
The way I read it (Mail) is that some poor woman was raped but because of her mental illness the police (even though they believed her and was sure she was raped) thought it was kinder not to put her through the trial, especially as the poor thing gave conflicting evidence (due to her illness of course, not that it never happened)
Then the brute rapist prosecuted her and forced her to kill herself [/quote]
Try reading again, honey (and this time put your glasses on !) |
|
|
|
|