King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: False allegations
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
JK2006	Exactly Honey. For example, the lies told about Matthew Kelly (who I had and have never met) in order to damage my appeal chances. Once the false allegations had been dropped he could have sued. But if he'd laid charges the moment he was accused, police would have had to investigate both sides for both claims instead of doing (as they tend to do) and just looking to find proof of the one claim.
honey!oh sugar sugar.	In The Know (as always) wrote: JK2006 wrote: And I think you'd find, Opus, that police would HAVE to investigate and arrest and question the person accused of false witness, perverting the CofJ and Wasting PT, as they must do for any crime. Largely agree, BUT ... you have to put into perspective that IF an allegation is made PURELY as a result of a previous (cross) allegation, its quite likely that the second allegation was made in mallice (becasuse if it weren't they would have complained earlier, wouldn't they?) But they wouldn't have been defamed before the allegation, would they?
JK2006	No ITK, the second allegation is of perverting the course of justice and wasting police time prompted by the MAKING of the first, false allegation. No malice at all. Simply complaining after the crime had been committed.
In The Know (as always)	JK2006 wrote: And I think you'd find, Opus, that police would HAVE to investigate and arrest and question the person accused of false witness, perverting the CofJ and Wasting PT, as they must do for any crime. Largely agree, BUT ... you have to put into perspective that IF an allegation is made PURELY as a result of a previous (cross) allegation, its quite likely that the second allegation was made in mallice (becasuse if it weren't they would have complained earlier, wouldn't they?)
honey!oh sugar sugar.	JK2006 wrote: One of the top solicitors in the field and a top barrister are examining the premise Honey and will let me (and you) know in due course. Individual accountability has arrived, as we can see with all the cops jailed over the phone hacking scandal (and several "leaks" are still being examined). I will be thrilled if it happens. I have lost all faith in the justice system after the recent farces.