King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Could Jimmy Savile ever get a fair British trial ?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
honey!oh sugar sugar.	MWTWATCHER wrote: because the statement from the judge, he does not state "beyond reasonable doubt" anymore its been changed yo "so that you are sure" has a different sort of ring to it. U do have some doubt, yes. I'm not sure but i think its guilty. not the same is it? No, it isn't. But once they started convicting with no evidence they couldn't very well say "beyond reasonable doubt" any more, could they?
Chris Retro	"Exciting News" from early 2012!
Chris Retro	This is all being done deliberately, and by the same dark forces behind all aspects of the Apocalypse. Watch this video, and listen carefully to the words being spoken.
MWTWATCHER	because the statement from the judge, he does not state "beyond reasonable doubt" anymore its been changed yo "so that you are sure" has a different sort of ring to it. U do have some doubt, yes. I'm not sure but i think its guilty. not the same is it?
Chris Retro	The answer is no man could get a 'fair trial' in the UK if charged with historic sex offences. Something weird happened between the acquittals of William Roache & Dave Lee Travis (1st trial) and the convictions of Max Clifford & Rolf Harris. "Beyond Reasonable Doubt" seems to mean diddly-squat to both judiciary & juries now