King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Glitter Guilty !
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
hedda	GG put his hand up for the porn and did his time. Since then he has been vilified beyond all reason and sanity in one of the most vicious personal campaigns of abuse, harassment I've ever witnessed. And by 'news' organisations that are now shown to be utterly corrupt. It has shocked and saddened me,not because I am a Glitter fan but so many people have ignored and remained silent about the demolition of one man for the prurient interest of readers in order to profit. How he could have ever got a fair trial is a mystery and if it were not a sex case he would have good grounds to get the trial stopped because of prejudicial reporting over 2 decades.
honey!oh sugar sugar.	In The Know (as always) wrote: In The Know (as always) wrote: * Breaking News * Let the deniers come forth ........... !!!!! ... and they came out in droves !!!!!! It is not a case of defending Glitter, but questioning the (lack of) evidence. Imagine that you are in a shop, and someone accuses you of shoplifting. No goods are found on you but it goes to court and the accuser is found to be believable and credible and so you are sent to jail? It is the same process. Unfair trials help nobody in the long run. The crime is so repugnant that we are closing our eyes to injustice.
In The Know (as always)	In The Know (as always) wrote: * Breaking News * Let the deniers come forth ........... !!!!! ... and they came out in droves !!!!!!
honey!oh sugar sugar.	Dr Who wrote: If you have 4000 images on your PC of red headed lesbians, you cant turn round and say... "lesbians make me sick and red has never been a hair colour that has done anything for me whatsoever!!" Right clicking and saving 4000 images of ANYTHING takes some doing. But I guess some of you think his Pc was faulty and the button just got stuck eh? I don't think anybody is disputing that he is guilty of possessing child abuse images, seen as he admitted it, but the point isn't if he is guilty or not. The point is that if someone (in any trial. It could be any crime anywhere) is convicted on only the word of one other person then it is not justice, and no good will come of it. How anyone can think it is ok is just beyond me!
honey!oh sugar sugar.	Chris Retro wrote: He's keen to clamp down on 'Evil Calenders' now. What an arsehole. twitter.com/mwilliamsthomas/status/564377417901703168 It is a bit worrying that someone from Kidscape thinks "Any profits should go to benefit the victims of sexual abuse.” How can any sane person think that being a victim gives you the right to all of the perpetrator's money? What on earth is he/she thinking? To my mind, it would be the tackiest thing in the world if the victims took even one penny from him. But maybe thats just me?