King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

[b]JK2006 wrote:[/b]
[quote]Of the 27 claims, over half were thrown out by the Judge (which is why lawyers have since told me we should have had the trial on all 27 - the jury seeing one after the other chucked would have acquitted me). Of the 12 remaining, the trials were divided. Eventually only 5 (6 charges) were in the first trial, in which I was found guilty. The rest were either in Trial 2 (acquitted) or 3,4 and 5, ordered abandoned by the judge.

People lie, or are genuinely mistaken, or have faulty memories (often transferring experiences from one person to another) or are persuaded by helpful, hard working police to "remember" things wrongly (especially dates).

Since the majority returned to visit me many times (one came back 50 times over three years until he was nearly 20), they were all assumed to have consented to anything that had occurred.

But Judge Paget decided to use the 5 complainants in the first trial as samples of all other claims and thus sentenced me accordingly.[/quote]

Enter code here

Topic History of: My Acquittal on all charges
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
JK2006	I have no idea why "KuRt" lied (amused you've gone with the Vile Pervert name as opposed to his real name when he "bravely" waived anonymity) but it's strange that he never mentioned me at all until sent away from Max Clifford's company with a flea in his ear "because nobody of interest abused him". No, not only did he never work for me but I never even met him until confronted with him by The Sun after my release. And have since found loads of evidence on that. But it's of no use to my appeal as his claims were ordered abandoned by the Judge, so his case was no part of my trials (to, I suspect, the delight of the police and prosecution, who knew he was only meant to be the trigger for more false claims that would prove more believable - Gambo's "fly paper" example).
William Flashman	If Kurt is lying, then what was his agenda? Did he make any money out of the whole thing? Is he just deranged? Why would he put himself through the trauma of testifying in a trial? And didn't he work for you and/or Chris Denning back in the 70s?
JK2006	Yes; the man who started my persecution shared a room in rehab with Will Self shortly before going to Max Clifford and making false allegations. I wondered whether he'd mentioned my name to Will and asked him after he gave the Longford Lecture a couple of years ago. Will confirmed he had NOT mentioned me despite pouring out all his past problems but then revealed the police had contacted him, after Kirk made his claims to them, and he'd told them my name had never been mentioned. You would think that would have made the police worry that this man's new claims might be fake. But no, they just chose to ignore Will's evidence. "You will be believed" unless you endanger our chances of getting a wrongful conviction.
Alan B	Did I dream it or was Wilf Self involved somewhere in your case?
honey!oh sugar sugar.	JK2006 wrote: Matthew Parris has always been supportive privately but the recent events have made him express his views publicly, as are many others. Little by little, Mr King.