IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
JK2006 wrote: He's been MP for Islington North since 1983 with a massive majority (over 20,000) so clearly those who have watched him for 35 years think he's done a pretty good job. Not quite the disaster portrayed in the media.
I wonder why? (LOL !)
Key points
- Islington had one of the highest child poverty rates in London (38%).
- Islington had one of the highest rates of out of work benefit recipients (12.2%), which may partly be explained by a high proportion of residents with a disability (13%).
- A low proportion of residents in Islington were low paid (12%) and as were a low proportion of jobs (11%) compared to the rest of London.
- In addition, only a small proportion of private renters were claiming housing benefit (12%). Taken together with the previous bullet points, this suggests that the London-wide story of substantial and growing in-work poverty and poverty in the private rented sector is less applicable to Islington.
- Under-attainment at GCSE level among pupils receiving free school meals was the third lowest of London boroughs (45% lacked 5 A*-C GCSEs or equivalent), but the proportion of 19 year olds lacking qualifications was the fifth highest (43% lacked a Level 3 qualification).
He's been MP for Islington North since 1983 with a massive majority (over 20,000) so clearly those who have watched him for 35 years think he's done a pretty good job. Not quite the disaster portrayed in the media.