cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Times triumph?
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 A frightening story and editorial in The Times today. They are cheering the fact that after four years they have been allowed to print the story that an innocent man was once accused of sex abuse. They do, admittedly, carry the fact that his accuser failed to identify him in a video lineup - some thing most people would find unusual for someone raped again and again over a period of years by somebody. Yet they announce with pride - this is a marvellous result for them. I'm sorry, Lord Murdoch, but I think these days the majority of the thinking public believes the presumption of innocence has long been replaced by the presumption of guilt, largely due to the media.