cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Sarah's Law
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
zooloo Having been provoked to find out a bit more about the issue before signing the petition mentioned elsewhere I am disturbed by what is going on.

As in your experience the accusation is news the refuting and proving innocence is not. That cannot be fair or right.

It is also troubling that a person is named and then advertised for accusers to step forwards. Given a potential financial incentive to accuse that cannot be fair or right either.

I am afraid that right and wrong are considered less important than salacious stories to sell newspapers, they know the difference as well as you but they don't care.
James L Hi,

I think JK is right about not putting people's names in newspapers until they are found guilty in the court for something.
my dad was taken to the police station about something that he just did not do. local paper still put him on the front Page! even when he was sent home by the judge for being innocent the paper never wrote anything to say that. he was just as guilty then! I am only 15 but i know the right and wrong of things. and the paper was wrong!

Jamie L, london
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2024 King of Hits.co.uk