Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Intense Terrorism
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
Spee32HR |
GCHQ* |
|
Spee32HR |
Of course, terrorism should have the best people in the business - because of the enormous damage that can be inflicted.
Just as important though - is interagency cooperation and information sharing.
In the US, despite excellent manpower - and trillions of dollars - this has frequently been found lacking.
The DEA, NSA, FBI, CIA, NASA etc. often plough their own furrow - to their cost. 9/11 May be a prime example.
Hopefully MI5, MI6, Scotland Yard, GHQ etc. are more in tune - and sharing their experiences, operations and data.
Although there seems to be little evidence of it...
 |
|
Randall |
JK2006 wrote:
Yes I rather think our police battling terrorism tend to be the best of the service whereas the officers provoking sex allegations and failing to balance investigations are the worst.
I agree. In anti terrorist policing there are clear standards of success and failure. Failure results in people being blown to bits. I imagine that concentrates the minds of the officers to do a proper job. |
|
JK2006 |
Yes I rather think our police battling terrorism tend to be the best of the service whereas the officers provoking sex allegations and failing to balance investigations are the worst. |
|
Spee32HR |
The words/view of the head of MI5 - and 'more difficult to detect'.
Five attacks in the UK so far this year - with 20 twarted in the last 4 years.
3,000 suspects being monitored - in an effort to protect us all.
An uncertain and unpredictable future lies ahead...
 |
|
|
|
