cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Bennell gets 31 years !
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
PaulB In The Know wrote:
PaulB wrote:
Until he popped up in the news today I'd never heard of him, and I'm still not sure what the dark web is, but I'm always surprised how quickly people rush to judgement on such limited info - no matter what the case.
I don't think I could do that.


You have got your cases mixed up - the dark web was the other paedo !



Not so much mixed up as lumped together, the way the courts and media (and public) lump certain types of case together.

It was a subtle example. "Thanks for playing along" (House MD)
Misa That gimp of a sports reporter at the Guardian, who started this whole thing off, must be delighted at the result..."Geddin, my son!" He - www.theguardian.com/football/2018/feb/19...entenced-to-31-years - explained the sentence in terms that may sit more comfortably with someone of ITK's capacity:
Clement Goldstone QC, gave him prison sentences totalling 454 years, to run concurrently.
We also learn that the learned judge felt it appropriate to describe Bennell as "the Devil incarnate", claims he considered imprisoning him for life, but expects him to die in prison anyway...and, given that, suggests the CPS should think carefully about pressing further charges.

Mob justice.
In The Know JK2006 wrote:
Congratulations ITK - your stupidest post yet, knowing well that none of these offences were committed after his previous convictions.

I don't know that at all - and neither do you.

... and there are a further 86 complaints still to come.

Well worth reading - www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-43106672

30 years - for 50 offences (including multiple rapes of boys) -seems very lenient ... only 7 months per offence.
In The Know PaulB wrote:
Until he popped up in the news today I'd never heard of him, and I'm still not sure what the dark web is, but I'm always surprised how quickly people rush to judgement on such limited info - no matter what the case.
I don't think I could do that.


You have got your cases mixed up - the dark web was the other paedo !
Randall JK2006 wrote:
Congratulations ITK - your stupidest post yet, knowing well that none of these offences were committed after his previous convictions.

Plus the general idea that more of the same will have the desired effect, when it hasn't hitherto.