Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Warboys - Supreme Court attacks police incompetence
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
md |
In The Know wrote:
Innocent until proven guilty.
and by "proven" - I mean who do the Jury believe?
If you've been convicted (and jailed several times already) of hundreds of similar cases (like Bennell) ... who would believe anything that that the defendant says - unless there was overwhelming evidence to support it????
A "Burden of Proof" chart has been recently doing the rounds on Twitter. I agree totally with Elizabeth Yeld's comment. It's very easy to get confused with the meaning of "beyond reasonable doubt".
twitter.com/lizyeld |
|
In The Know (as always !) |
comrade hedda wrote:
ITK was so useless they sent him to London with the sole purpose of reporting on what Margaret Thatcher had for breakfast each morning and what she was wearing each day and what the colour of her underwear was.
This had tragic consequences when Mrs ITK was sent to Harrods in an attempt to see if Thatcher was a customer and there she developed a taste for expensive shoes which has never diminished.
I would have thought that YOU were more qualified to report on dresses, hedda? |
|
In The Know |
md wrote:
Thanks ITK, though I forgot to add something that I think the current police policy also seems to forget. When an allegation is reported, it's equally important to treat the accused respectfully and for their side of the story to be treated seriously, listened to and investigated. Who else apart from the accuser, the accused and eyewitnesses can tell who is telling the truth at this stage?
... again, spot on, md !
Innocent until proven guilty.
and by "proven" - I mean who do the Jury believe?
If you've been convicted (and jailed several times already) of hundreds of similar cases (like Bennell) ... who would believe anything that that the defendant says - unless there was overwhelming evidence to support it???? |
|
comrade hedda |
JK2006 wrote:
Example - a loony comes in to local cop shop to claim ITK is a Communist Spy. Ludicrous but requires investigation (as with Corbyn and discovering he was the other end of the country the day after his Mother died). Very quickly Plod would decide - silly, false, drop it, go no further.
Not so quick..why do you think he uses the initials "ITK"?..real name Ivan Tasha Kazankov ex KGB (booted as incompetent) and farmed out to the Stasi and a contemporary of Czechoslovakian spy and Jeremy Corbyn afternoon tea pal Ján Sarkocy.
Together they were known as the Laurel & Hardy of the "intelligence" world (for obvious reasons).
ITK was so useless they sent him to London with the sole purpose of reporting on what Margaret Thatcher had for breakfast each morning and what she was wearing each day and what the colour of her underwear was.
This had tragic consequences when Mrs ITK was sent to Harrods in an attempt to see if Thatcher was a customer and there she developed a taste for expensive shoes which has never diminished.
ITK (Ivan) now spends his twilight days trolling websites like this in the hope he may (fruitlessly) diminish the image of the coming Ruler Of Great Brittan Jeremy Corbyn..or The Cob as he is known to his pals and in MI5 files.  |
|
md |
Thanks ITK, though I forgot to add something that I think the current police policy also seems to forget. When an allegation is reported, it's equally important to treat the accused respectfully and for their side of the story to be treated seriously, listened to and investigated. Who else apart from the accuser, the accused and eyewitnesses can tell who is telling the truth at this stage? |
|
|
|
