King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: Money for Catholic Church shrinks...
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Barney	Murphy is one of thousands of RCC paedophiles - and one of the very few convicted. Simply because the Catholic church refuses to release its records on these matters, and personnel. Frequently, diplomatic immunity has been used to justify non-disclosure/compliance - using the unique and powerful status of Vatican City. Bequeathed by Mussolini! Father Capella (Washington) is just one example - of one who used this escape route (back to Rome) which was authorised by Francis.
wjlmarsh	Barney wrote: Would you continue to donate to the Catholic church - if one of their paedophile priests (Kevin Murphy/Liverpool and/or his mates/for example) abused your child? Father John Kevin Murphy just read an account of the trial. So many of these historical sex abuse cases as per news media details which do seem to at times highlight salient points appears to have two possible real stories what one is true? One been as stated as per trial and outcome. Second that the first two colluded and found the other over time to give weight. The priest under duress confessed and the swimming and camping were two activities boys enjoy or if as per trial also two activities to sexually abuse. Although I can not understand why? I know people do really horrible things so it happens. I also like to see clear cases of "a fair trial" which when I read the article I can see justice was served for sure which in almost all cases can only take place in current time when the evidence does exist (and maybe there was evidence from the actual time of archived parish records noting over time several reports and concerns about the priest as in a very few cases there has been something of the evidence nature)
JK2006	I wouldn't donate to that specific abuser but I certainly wouldn't stop donating to the company he worked for... we're back to the Great Ormond Street fiasco, aren't we?
Barney	Would you continue to donate to the Catholic church - if one of their paedophile priests (Kevin Murphy/Liverpool and/or his mates/for example) abused your child?
honey!oh sugar sugar.	Barney wrote: honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote: Withholding donations is just cutting off your nose to spite your face. You think we should donate to an organisation whose head (the Pope) has now admitted widespread child abuse by his underlings? In Pennsylvania alone, the Grand Jury found that 1,000s of children were systematically abused by hundreds of priests - for over 70 years. If some people's lives and well-being depend on that money, YES! Why would you want to punish innocent people?