IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
I'm with you on this one MWTW and I think the notion of ignoring Mary is a bit bizarre although I can understand the thinking behind it.
MWT has a record in just a few short years of causing havoc for innocent people including our host JK.
All his actions should be questioned.
And yes your original post is spot on -his very silence given the circumstances is significant.
honey!oh sugar sugar.
I agree with Prue mostly. Not about MWT watcher specifically, who I find mostly justified (if a little over-zealous at times ) but the very unpleasant posting that has occurred recently is quite off-putting, and not at all helpful.
Pru
Oh yes, and JK - indulging this stuff is beneath you.
Pru
Jo wrote: Judging from the number of retweets/likes for his recent tweets, Steph can rest assured that far fewer people are paying attention to MWT than were doing so in 2012. The (originally) near 900 retweets for his breaking news of Rolf Harris being questioned by police in connection with "Savile other sexual offences" was quite an achievement that I suspect reeled in false accusers and helped land Rolf Harris in jail. So I don't think he can be dismissed as silly. He's a cunning operator and I see no harm in MWTW keeping an eye on him.
Keeping an eye on him - I have no problems with that, in spite of his misogynistic tendencies. Obsessing over him, and adopting his name into this character's on here - that's a bit disturbing.