Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: Huddersfield Grooming Gang
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
holocaust21 |
I agree with JK's skepticism. Arguing that sex at a certain age is automatically "abuse" is just retarded. It's like arguing that driving is murder, even when no one has been run over and no one is dead! Also plenty of scope for totally false allegations as well. Whether there might be some truth here and there is besides the point. There might be some truth to Nazi propaganda against Jews, I bet there were a few Jewish murderers of Aryan's, but does that justify killing 6 million Jews of which maybe a hundred or so had committed a few murders? Hardly! In fact, we regard the Nazi's as the villain - quite rightly too - and hence we should regard the UK police as the villains in this case as well.
Anyway, I think the people on here who are making arguments in favor of locking up men for allegedly having sex with underage girls are really conjuring up the argument as an after thought. The reality is that they *want* sex with underage girls to be considered abuse and/or they *want* these allegations to be considered true. That's why their arguments are nonsensical gibberish and it's generally not possible to argue with them - they are not interested in the truth, they are ideologically motivated. Now the question we must ask is, why do they want it to be true that underage sex causes terrible harm and/or that pakistani's are raping white girls? |
|
hedda |
the so-called "ring leader" was a Hindu so Not A Muslim at all.
this case seems a lot to do with deprivation and poverty with girls coming from shocking home lives where they are gradually drawn into a lifestyle that is fairly destructive.
The great thing is that you can then sort of re-write your history and absolve yourself of all self blame.
I'm not saying things couldn't have panned out any other way..poverty is a crime in itself which no-one should be a victim of.
The claim police, councils etc "looked the other way" is ridiculous of course as everything in retrospect is much easier to see especially when it's those who were also completely ignorant or not interested in the failings of society take the High Moral Road.
I blame society.  |
|
Barney |
Just travel a lot.
Germany, France and Slovakia have strong penalties for nazi tattoos.
Vietnam and Thailand have them for Buddha related tattoos etc.
Different countries have different rules, even for the ages of recipients.
Many say that for security and identification reasons, a small tattoo (in an obscure place) is a good idea.
Like the US Navy Seals, Special Forces, SAS etc.
 |
|
honey!oh sugar sugar. |
Barney wrote:
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
Barney wrote:
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
I think some adults should be banned from tattoos
By whom - and using what criteria?
It was VERY CLEARLY a light- hearted comment, Barney!
But tattoos are illegal in a number of countries, like Denmark.
And virtually illegal in Sri Lanka and Japan - where those with tattoos would be very unwelcome in public bathing areas.
UAE countries aren't keen either!
Are they really, Barney? You are a mine of information, and I had no idea.
At least my friend with the accidentally unfortunate tattoo had the freedom to do it.  |
|
Barney |
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
Barney wrote:
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
I think some adults should be banned from tattoos
By whom - and using what criteria?
It was VERY CLEARLY a light- hearted comment, Barney!
But tattoos are illegal in a number of countries, like Denmark.
And virtually illegal in Sri Lanka and Japan - where those with tattoos would be very unwelcome in public bathing areas.
UAE countries aren't keen either!
|
|
|
|
