cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Womens Equality Party
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Barney The word 'accused' - if in this party's manifesto - makes any progress unlikely.


And is, almost certainly, illegal...



honey!oh sugar sugar. wyot wrote:
Now I normally stay away from all the "sex stuff" threads on here but an article in The Times today has made my blood boil.

The Womens Equality Party intends to field candidates in all constituncies where the incumbent male mp has been accused - accused is sufficient for them! - of sexual assault or harrassment.

Due process may still feature in Courts but appears scarily irrelevant elsewhere...


And they can openly say this, and most people dont seem to care?!
wyot Now I normally stay away from all the "sex stuff" threads on here but an article in The Times today has made my blood boil.

The Womens Equality Party intends to field candidates in all constituncies where the incumbent male mp has been accused - accused is sufficient for them! - of sexual assault or harrassment.

Due process may still feature in Courts but appears scarily irrelevant elsewhere...