IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
|
Home Forums |
|
|
Topic History of: This Might Make You Laugh... Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Barney |
honey!oh sugar sugar. wrote:
Barney wrote:
But why Honey did you not show Book's post in your reply
It's your usual strategy
Hopefully, in future you won't see the need to show us what we've seen already
There isn't a logic, need or requirement to repost/repeat - what we've all seen already
Your comments though are unique and thought provoking
Barney, I find it quite worrying that you never miss an opportunity for nastiness.
I hope you are ok?
I have already explained why I quote the post I am replying to.
It is because with the gap in-between posting and publishing, there is no way of knowing who has replied in the meantime, or what they have said, and it can sometimes appear that you are replying to a different post than intended.
Sometimes, especially on this site, posters can have views which I find extremely objectionable, and I prefer to make it absolutely clear that I am not agreeing, and the easiest way to do this is by quoting the post so there is no doubt.
If I post on YOUR site, Barney, I shall follow your little rule about quoting.
Or, if Mr King objects, as is his right, and asks me stop, I might have to stop posting.
Until then, I will carry on as I am, thanks!
noted |
Bookworm |
I didn't see your reply until now.
Not all comments are showing up.
I thought the boards were hacked recently. Site was showing offline. |
honey!oh sugar sugar. |
Barney wrote:
But why Honey did you not show Book's post in your reply
It's your usual strategy
Hopefully, in future you won't see the need to show us what we've seen already
There isn't a logic, need or requirement to repost/repeat - what we've all seen already
Your comments though are unique and thought provoking
Barney, I find it quite worrying that you never miss an opportunity for nastiness.
I hope you are ok?
I have already explained why I quote the post I am replying to.
It is because with the gap in-between posting and publishing, there is no way of knowing who has replied in the meantime, or what they have said, and it can sometimes appear that you are replying to a different post than intended.
Sometimes, especially on this site, posters can have views which I find extremely objectionable, and I prefer to make it absolutely clear that I am not agreeing, and the easiest way to do this is by quoting the post so there is no doubt.
If I post on YOUR site, Barney, I shall follow your little rule about quoting.
Or, if Mr King objects, as is his right, and asks me stop, I might have to stop posting.
Until then, I will carry on as I am, thanks! |
Bookworm |
Never a dull moment here!
Last week was just calamity after calamity.
Last night everyone was in bed (around 11pm) I heard "Mum, I just heard a noise in the kitchen."
I actually heard it too.
Son:" Are you going to do something?"
Me:" Go away burglars."
Son:" Stop being silly. Go and check."
I grab my two secret weapons from under my bed and check all the rooms.
Turns out it was just a carrier bag had fallen over with recycling stuff in it.
I told him nobody will get in here without being seen or heard or killed!
I was glad when my eldest moved out after putting up with his insect phobia waking me up at all hours. |
Barney |
But why Honey did you not show Book's post in your reply
It's your usual strategy
Hopefully, in future you won't see the need to show us what we've seen already
There isn't a logic, need or requirement to repost/repeat - what we've all seen already
Your comments though are unique and thought provoking
|
|
|
|
|