King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: The Judge in the Ayia Napa case
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Green Man	JK2006 wrote: "The reason why she initially gave false statements was because she realised that she was being recorded while she was having sexual intercourse and so she was placed in a difficult position and felt embarrassed. "She then apologised saying she had made a mistake by filing a false statement." He said the woman "did not make a good impression, she did not tell the truth, and tried to mislead the court" during her evidence. "There was no rape, or violence, and police had carried out a thorough investigation making all necessary arrests," the judge added. I really cannot see how this can be rejected by observers. Please explain why she cannot now be considered a False Accuser. You should of watched last night's Press Preview with Yasmin Brown-Alibhai. She says there's evidence of Ayia being raped etc. However I haven't seen or read anything that goes with narrative. Hedda could you please give me some links ?
JK2006	"The reason why she initially gave false statements was because she realised that she was being recorded while she was having sexual intercourse and so she was placed in a difficult position and felt embarrassed. "She then apologised saying she had made a mistake by filing a false statement." He said the woman "did not make a good impression, she did not tell the truth, and tried to mislead the court" during her evidence. "There was no rape, or violence, and police had carried out a thorough investigation making all necessary arrests," the judge added. I really cannot see how this can be rejected by observers. Please explain why she cannot now be considered a False Accuser.