King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

Enter code here

Topic History of: This is an interesting article
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
Honey	And... The thickest person I have ever met is a traffic warden. They can shove their traffic wardens! Sorry. The red mist came down.
Honey	WHAT THE BLOODY HELL IS THIS? Are they morons? How can they use the phrase "investigating why the case collapsed" when it implies guilt? The phrase should be "investigating why an innocent man was accused and mistreated". As for referring to "victims" when it has been shown that there were no victims other than YOU, it is, in my opinion, vicious and libellous, and they should be fired.
JK2006	Note the subtle lies (by omission) in the quotes. The "persistent misleading of the Court", as referred to by the Judge, applied to the police and CPS. It has been studiously ignored by Surrey Police. They - and, indeed, Hydrant - ignore the "lack of training" by officers investigating. The fact that retired traffic wardens, family liaison officers and transport police were brought back is touched on in the Hydrant Report but only briefly. False accusers are still called "victims" by Surrey Police though proved to be liars. www.surreycomet.co.uk/news/18056075.dj-j...nisational-failures/