cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Excellent and horrifying proof of JUSTICE in Britain today
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
In The Know Local Government Ombudsman reports the case of Mr
JK2006 Believe me Zoo her points are not only well made and sensible but frighteningly accurate.

For example, I was told (and told all my kind character witnesses) there would be no cross examination or questioning.
Then, to my (and his) dismay, the loathsome prosecutor (who had hair all over his body which he scratched like a gorilla) snarled at one fine and upstanding celebrity who had just been saying what a decent guy I was... "Did you know your FRIEND took little boys back to his house and buggered them?".

I couldn't shout "No I Didn't!" and though the Judge did stop him there, the damage was done.
zooloo This whole Lawyer thing...

"...the lawyer asked her if she loved her son 'in the knowledge that he kicked a man to death'."

Is this adversarial system really the best system?

It brings to mind another case - if the lawyer says "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury it is for you to decide if this a man or a MONSTER"...

How can the fellow in the dock counter that, an emotive claim can stick in the mind more than a prosaic reasoned explanation.

Sorry to creep off-topic but something is very wrong with the whole system.
JK2006 Actually Zoo that's what (unintentionally) is important.

Let's face it, the Times is a tabloid now and this is very tabloid mentality yet still they are almost openly saying "police and CPS are corrupt".

Check the reader comments below the piece.

The tide is turning. The tabloids are starting to notice. All it needs is that nudge towards the obvious - "perhaps not all innocent people get off"... and they could even put 2 and 2 together.
zooloo It is a good point which I agree with but the article slips towards the very thing they condemn.

"She said: '...a so-called friend of Boris Johnson