King of Hits.co.uk - Your Views Messageboard

IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.

Home

Forums

	Messageboards	Categories Show latest posts

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register. Lost Password?

Messageboards

King of Hits

Your Views Messageboard

Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"

Name:

Subject:

Boardcode:

Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons





More Smilies

[b]chrissy wrote:[/b]
[quote]...on commonsense prevailing. Jim Gamble , Chief of the police's Child Protection Unit says that  those who view child porn on the web, should in most cases be spared jail. I tend to agree, in so far that many who pay for such vile imagery, wont go on to assault or harm children, and in fact don't. Our jails are full to the rafters, and we need more space for the thugs and the yobs who are more of a risk to our way of life.

Of course it can be argued that those who do subscribe to child porn are directly harming children by funding those who churn the muck out, but my rational side understands that jailing them is pointless. Greater punishment would come through restricting their activities through stopping their usage of credit facilities, preventing them from using a computer etc'.

Of course this will have your average Sun reader up in arms, whom now associate irresponsible parenting with pretty winged insects and all things sugary and sweet (not wanting to further add to the McCann's woe), but irresponsible parenting  leads to anti social behaviour, thuggery and our streets besieged by morons whose idea of a good time is to thump people.

Last week my mother , who is 70, was spat at in the face by a thoroughly unpleasant individual who felt she had forced him out of a parking space. Now that frightens me more than anything. And angry.

I'm not backing child porn. I just observe commonsense when I see it.[/quote]

Enter code here

Topic History of: Gamble Gambles...
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)

Author	Message
chrissy	LOL. Thanks Jonathan. I just didn't want people to think I was illiterate.
JK2006	Have changed the thread title Chrissy though I rather prefer the original... it brings visions of little innocent lambs frolicking towards slaughter, which is rather apt.
In The Know	A well reasoned post - I heartily agree.
chrissy	Just to let you know the thread title should read 'Gamble gambles'...please can you change the typo?
JK2006	I've always found the argument about this rather strange, knowing how well Photoshop and others can create genuine looking pictures. It's beyond me why anyone would want to look at such pictures but I don't go along with the "it is creating a market" argument - otherwise please lock up all alcohol and nicotine manufacturers. And Fleet Street sources tell me the Gamble remark might just be because there's about to be a huge scandal around Operation Ore.