cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Trump and Covid19
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
JK2006 Yes (I love HardTalk Jo; very under rated show). That is typical of the moronic approach taken by the majority. Absolutely correct if the media image of Covid19 is believed; not just difficult but impossible to single out the vulnerable. If, however, my assumption was correct (media inflate everything and it was only lethal to a tiny percentage, mainly the elderly); it was not just incredibly easy but essential (and inexpensive) to target care homes and hospitals (and then dense populations in prisons, refugee camps etc). Allowing 99% of the world to continue living as normal - and urging them (PUBLICITY) to avoid infecting the vulnerable and to self isolate if vulnerable.
Jo The director of the Wellcome Trust was interviewed on Hardtalk recently and Stephen Sackur asked him something along the lines of why UK policy hadn't been to target protection at the vulnerable. He replied that that would have been difficult or impossible to single them out.

www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000lntw
wyot Absolutely agree.

This link provides a clear guide to the actual fatality rates per country against infections as opposed to numbers of people.

coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality

As you pojnt out JK we are outliers at 15.1% case fatality and the US 3.3%.

Trump is correct on this point just couldn't articulate it; as he struggles to do with any subject beyond what he wants for tea...

My suspicion is our appalling rate is largely down to our botched response to care homes/protecting vulnerable.

Elsewhere, Boris gets ever tougher in his attempt to win back the love of the people and allows councils to bulldoze buildings as a response to the virus:

www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/08/04/...ngs-new-powers-stop/

That'll sort it given it is transmitted through the air between people.

Why not just employ the newly unemployed to clean the building safely?

Scaremongering; what scaremongering!!
JK2006 and
JK2006 and