cartoon

















IMPORTANT NOTE:
You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
King of Hits
Home arrow Forums
Messageboards
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Messageboards
King of Hits
Your Views Messageboard
Post a new message in "Your Views Messageboard"
Name:
Subject:
Boardcode:
B I U S Sub Sup Size Color Spoiler Hide ul ol li left center right Quote Code Img URL  
Message:
(+) / (-)

Emoticons
B) :( :) :laugh:
:cheer: ;) :P :angry:
:unsure: :ohmy: :huh: :dry:
:lol: :silly: :blink: :blush:
:kiss: :woohoo: :side: :S
More Smilies
 Enter code here   

Topic History of: Buried away in a tiny local paper (yet strangely popping out when you Google Judge Richards)...
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author Message
Anthony So, here we go again.

The most significant part of that article is the legal thinking that had this new evidence been known at the time, it would have changed the way medical evidence was considered.

Now surely medical evidence is medical evidence. Not something to be spun in accordance with the CPS/ Prosecution lawyers/judge/jury's preconceived ideas of a man's guilt.

Oh, how naive I am!

And they're considering the possibility of a retrial? The man is due for release in September after serving 6 years for an unsafe conviction!
JK2006 www.eveningleader.co.uk/news?articleid=2943819
Powered by Kunena
 
© 2005 – 2024 King of Hits.co.uk