Home  Forums |
|
|
|
|
Topic History of: All of Liverpool tested.
Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
|
middlemas |
Honey wrote:
I cant think of any reason why they cant all be tested on the same day
A logistically massive feat - though yes, possible.
Last Saturday, Slovakia tested 2.58 million people - nearly half its population. Another day is being arranged for the other half.
Over 40,000 police, administrators, army, medics etc. - manned 5,000 sites around the country, for the swaps to be taken.
1% were found to be positive, and these people are quarantined - or about to be. |
|
Honey |
Wyot wrote:
[quote]Honey wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
[quote]middlemas wrote:
Honey wrote:
And if the lockdown DOESNT prevent infection, what the hell is it for?
Quite. And if they know how many asymptomatic have it it would show that it was even more trivial than we already know. So what? Then what? The same numbers will still be hospitalised and dying whatever we know about infection levels, presenting the same NHS capacity issue and the same political problem of having made Covid deaths exceptional over other ways to die.
All beyond me what they are up to.
Wyot, at this point if they hand delivered a chimpanzee in a wig to every household in Britain in order to "save lives and protect the NHS" it wouldn't even surprise me. 
I feel like I am trapped in a Brian Rix farce. |
|
Honey |
middlemas wrote:
Honey wrote:
The same way they get everyone to vote at the same time, I suppose? Or just send the tests in the post.
Voting isn't simultaneous, anywhere
Historically, random testing (for diseases/infections) has been more successful
Many medical tests can be done - privately/bathroom/etc - and posted
Exactly what I said.
People DO vote on the same day, and I cant think of any reason why they cant all be tested on the same day, for accuracy.
How would random checks work? |
|
Wyot |
Honey wrote:
[quote]Wyot wrote:
[quote]middlemas wrote:
[quote]Honey wrote:
And if the lockdown DOESNT prevent infection, what the hell is it for?
Quite. And if they know how many asymptomatic have it it would show that it was even more trivial than we already know. So what? Then what? The same numbers will still be hospitalised and dying whatever we know about infection levels, presenting the same NHS capacity issue and the same political problem of having made Covid deaths exceptional over other ways to die.
All beyond me what they are up to. |
|
middlemas |
Honey wrote:
The same way they get everyone to vote at the same time, I suppose? Or just send the tests in the post.
Voting isn't simultaneous, anywhere
Historically, random testing (for diseases/infections) has been more successful
Many medical tests can be done - privately/bathroom/etc - and posted |
|
|
|
