IMPORTANT NOTE: You do NOT have to register to read, post, listen or contribute. If you simply wish to remain fully anonymous, you can still contribute.
Topic History of: I would have thought Max. showing the last 5 posts - (Last post first)
Author
Message
Wyot
Wow so the initial story was to rebut claims it only had an 8% efficacy and in doing so they have revealed that only 3% of those tested were over 70?! Have I got that right?
This is terrible news for getting out of this shit. So it was a rush job then...
Wonder what will come out the woodwork with the other vaccines now... Boris and GB leading the way again....
Honey
I think it would be perfectly acceptable if they just said from the start...
"look, we couldn't test it on you oldies in case we killed you, so we are just hoping for the best, and
because your immune systems are worn out you might not develop enough antibodies, but its better than nothing"
Instead of all the boasting and pretending.
JK2006
The most vulnerable are the over 80s. So only test it on a few. DOH!
JK2006
I find it absolutely extraordinary that this vaccine was approved when only such a tiny quantity of over 60s were amongst the test group. It can ONLY be explained that the medics, scientists and official approval body were totally dominated by our STUPID politicians and the STUPID media looking for a quick, fast vaccine.
When everybody knew this STUPID virus is, mainly, only lethal to the over 60s.